H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Anna Kalinskaya vs Tamara Zidansek H2H: 1-2
Tamara Zidansek holds a 2–1 lead over Anna Kalinskaya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Tamara Zidansek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Kalinskaya won the 2022 Lausanne third round 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 28
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2022* | Lausanne | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Anna Kalinskaya | 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data |
| Apr 8, 2021* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Tamara Zidansek | 6-0 7-5 | Anna Kalinskaya | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2020 | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Tamara Zidansek | 6-3 6-4 | Anna Kalinskaya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Kalinskaya | #20 | #11 | 2,975 | 1,957 | 134 | 122 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tamara Zidansek | #148 | #22 | 1,991 | 1,800 | 83 | 92 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Kalinskaya | Tamara Zidansek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2017 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #114 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #65 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #111 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2023 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2024 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2025 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,885 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2026 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,903 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #148 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |