H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova vs Ekaterina Makarova H2H: 0-1
Ekaterina Makarova holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Karolina Schmiedlova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ekaterina Makarova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics third round 3-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 31
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 38
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2016* | Rio de Janeiro Olympics | Olympics | R32 | Hard | Ekaterina Makarova | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | #379 | #26 | 1,875 | 1,790 | 120 | 165 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ekaterina Makarova | #1,000 | #8 | 3,620 | 1,941 | 250 | 223 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | Ekaterina Makarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #83 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #73 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #46 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 4–23 | 14.8% | #227 | 1,497 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #60 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #49 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2018 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #78 | 1,546 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #53 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #20 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,677 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #24 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #11 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2022 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2023 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2024 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #110 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #33 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #57 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #997 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |