H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova vs Nao Hibino H2H: 2-0
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova holds a 2–0 lead over Nao Hibino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anna Karolina Schmiedlova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Karolina Schmiedlova won the 2021 Guadalajara third round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 31
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2021* | Guadalajara | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | 6-1 7-5 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2018* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | #379 | #26 | 1,875 | 1,792 | 115 | 162 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Nao Hibino | #235 | #56 | 1,050 | 1,726 | 79 | 118 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | Nao Hibino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #83 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #73 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #66 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–22 | 12.0% | #227 | 1,486 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2018 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #129 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2022 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2023 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2024 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #174 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |