H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:33 UTC
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Kristina Mladenovic H2H: 1-1
Anna-Lena Friedsam and Kristina Mladenovic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kristina Mladenovic leads 1–0 on grass, while Anna-Lena Friedsam leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Friedsam won the 2020 Lyon fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 33
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2026 | Auckland | WTA 250 | Q1 | Hard | Kristina Mladenovic | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Match data |
| Mar 6, 2020* | Lyon | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Anna-Lena Friedsam | 6-3 6-3 | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2016* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Kristina Mladenovic | 6-4 7-6(4) | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | #227 | #45 | 1,160 | 1,740 | 61 | 83 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kristina Mladenovic | #395 | #10 | 3,155 | 1,926 | 212 | 232 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Kristina Mladenovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #300 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #85 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #55 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #95 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #67 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #483 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #11 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #43 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #111 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #39 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #140 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #50 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #135 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #152 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,432 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |