H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Kristina Mladenovic H2H: 1-1

Anna-Lena Friedsam and Kristina Mladenovic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kristina Mladenovic leads 1–0 on grass, while Anna-Lena Friedsam leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Friedsam won the 2020 Lyon second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna-Lena Friedsam
Germany Age 32 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Kristina Mladenovic
France Age 33 Right-Handed 184 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kristina Mladenovic 7-6(5) 6-4 Anna-Lena Friedsam #154 Match data Jan 2, 2026 Q1 Q ASB Classic WTA 250 Hard
Anna-Lena Friedsam #136 6-3 6-3 Kristina Mladenovic #42 Match data Mar 6, 2020* R16 Lyon International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Kristina Mladenovic #33 6-4 7-6(4) Anna-Lena Friedsam #58 Match data Jun 24, 2016* R16 Eastbourne Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna-Lena Friedsam #251 #45 1,160 1,743 62 84 42.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kristina Mladenovic — #10 3,155 1,929 211 237 47.1% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Kristina Mladenovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2009 0–4 0.0% #202 1,450 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2010 1–2 33.3% #300 1,460 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #141 1,451 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2012 5–5 50.0% #96 1,510 0 0
20 2014 7–10 41.2% #85 1,539 0 0 2013 21–25 45.7% #55 1,550 0 0
21 2015 11–14 44.0% #95 1,582 0 0 2014 15–23 39.5% #67 1,598 0 0
22 2016 15–14 51.7% #67 1,645 0 0 2015 35–25 58.3% #29 1,730 0 0
23 2017 0–1 0.0% #507 1,601 0 0 2016 29–29 50.0% #42 1,726 0 0
24 2018 1–2 33.3% #483 1,596 0 0 2017 35–26 57.4% #11 1,640 0 1
25 2019 7–9 43.8% #145 1,658 0 0 2018 19–27 41.3% #43 1,659 0 1
26 2020 5–4 55.6% #111 1,646 0 0 2019 27–23 54.0% #39 1,791 0 1
27 2021 5–11 31.2% #140 1,566 0 0 2020 4–9 30.8% #50 1,715 0 1
28 2022 4–3 57.1% #120 1,690 0 0 2021 17–23 42.5% #86 1,663 0 1
29 2023 7–14 33.3% #135 1,605 0 0 2022 3–8 27.3% #152 1,531 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2023 0–4 0.0% #239 1,415 0 1
31 2025 0–1 0.0% #154 1,652 0 0 2024 0–2 0.0% #210 1,436 0 1
32 2026 0–1 0.0% #251 1,571 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% — 1,374 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Kristina Mladenovic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2014 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 11 14 25 44.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 2015 7 9 16 43.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 12 15 27 44.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2016 6 5 11 54.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2015 17 18 35 48.6% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
23 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 16 19 35 45.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
24 2018 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 16 18 34 47.1% 13 4 17 76.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
25 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2018 13 19 32 40.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
26 2020 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 17 16 33 51.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
27 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2022 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 11 14 25 44.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
29 2023 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2022 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 36 44 80 45.0% 18 28 46 39.1% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — 123 152 275 44.7% 51 56 107 47.7% 33 27 60 55.0% 4 2 6 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 129/145 of Anna-Lena Friedsam's and 411/449 of Kristina Mladenovic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Kristina Mladenovic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 3/4 3.0 6.7 50.3% 56.2% 40.8% 41.7% 66.7% 48.7% 42.0%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 3/3 1.3 9.7 54.7% 55.0% 35.8% 42.7% 38.1% 46.1% 43.5%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 1/1 1.0 5.0 48.9% 54.3% 52.1% 56.3% 41.2% 53.2% 47.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 10/10 4.9 5.2 53.3% 69.2% 44.2% 42.1% 56.0% 57.7% 40.3%
20 2014 17/17 4.1 4.2 59.9% 64.7% 46.0% 49.9% 55.8% 56.9% 42.6% 2013 40/46 4.3 4.3 57.1% 66.7% 41.4% 56.8% 41.1% 55.8% 41.4%
21 2015 13/25 3.2 4.8 62.7% 64.0% 48.7% 45.1% 40.6% 58.1% 40.1% 2014 38/38 4.2 6.4 55.3% 66.7% 39.8% 52.9% 44.4% 54.8% 40.0%
22 2016 29/29 4.1 2.7 64.0% 66.8% 48.7% 55.2% 47.6% 60.2% 38.8% 2015 45/60 4.8 3.4 60.1% 67.7% 51.0% 49.7% 46.0% 61.1% 40.6%
23 2017 1/1 1.0 1.0 66.2% 51.0% 50.0% 61.5% 66.7% 50.6% 39.1% 2016 48/59 3.6 4.7 57.9% 65.9% 43.6% 52.9% 43.9% 56.5% 42.9%
24 2018 3/3 0.7 3.3 67.6% 52.3% 49.5% 65.9% 60.0% 52.0% 37.7% 2017 59/61 4.5 5.4 60.9% 67.6% 43.9% 53.1% 46.7% 58.0% 44.2%
25 2019 16/16 1.4 3.6 67.0% 62.6% 46.2% 56.0% 50.1% 56.9% 39.8% 2018 44/46 3.4 5.3 57.6% 65.7% 44.3% 55.8% 46.0% 56.3% 40.5%
26 2020 9/9 2.3 2.4 69.6% 67.9% 51.0% 45.4% 37.7% 62.7% 43.3% 2019 50/50 3.2 5.3 57.4% 66.9% 40.9% 52.3% 52.3% 55.8% 44.9%
27 2021 14/16 3.4 3.6 64.3% 63.5% 43.8% 55.2% 37.7% 56.5% 39.4% 2020 13/13 2.8 8.2 55.6% 65.6% 36.2% 45.6% 51.6% 52.5% 42.5%
28 2022 5/7 4.4 4.4 66.0% 62.0% 45.6% 57.1% 64.1% 56.3% 41.2% 2021 39/40 1.2 6.3 61.0% 60.1% 39.7% 41.6% 46.0% 52.1% 43.8%
29 2023 21/21 3.3 3.0 66.8% 62.2% 45.3% 54.4% 54.5% 56.6% 42.0% 2022 11/11 2.0 11.4 61.3% 62.3% 33.8% 47.5% 45.1% 50.8% 41.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 4/4 0.0 7.8 67.5% 54.9% 26.0% 23.8% 36.1% 44.6% 36.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 2/2 0.0 6.5 72.4% 50.5% 35.4% 51.4% 50.0% 46.1% 35.2%
32 2026 1/1 3.0 3.0 70.0% 50.0% 46.7% 41.7% 55.6% 49.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 1/1 1.0 5.0 74.5% 55.7% 37.5% 30.0% 42.9% 51.1% 47.9%
Career — 129/146 3.3 3.4 64.8% 63.9% 47.0% 53.0% 48.8% 57.8% 40.5% — 411/449 3.6 5.5 58.5% 65.6% 42.5% 51.0% 46.4% 55.9% 42.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Kristina Mladenovic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1451 96.5 -2.63 -1.10 0.818 45.5% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.30
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1461 99.6 -1.61 +0.39 0.807 44.7% — +40 — 28.6% -2.14 1–0 1–0 — -0.19
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1451 99.6 -0.83 -1.21 1.005 50.0% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.04
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1510 114.3 +0.51 -1.53 0.953 49.6% +52 — — 47.8% -0.04 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.70
20 2014 1540 113.8 +0.51 -1.51 0.986 49.8% +14 -1 — 43.9% -0.29 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 100.5 -0.25 2013 1551 121.5 -0.70 -2.52 0.937 48.8% +18 -42 +20 45.2% -0.35 7–7 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 104.5 +0.36
21 2015 1583 117.4 -0.11 -1.37 0.957 49.5% +1 -45 — 45.6% -0.30 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 100.4 +0.50 2014 1598 125.1 -1.11 -2.46 0.884 47.5% +25 -91 — 40.4% -0.66 7–6 (54%) 2–5 (29%) 101.3 -1.37
22 2016 1646 122.7 +3.29 -3.20 0.976 49.4% -4 -78 -8 49.2% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -0.34 2015 1730 133.9 +2.60 -0.61 1.045 50.9% -60 -95 -18 55.2% +0.30 10–10 (50%) 10–7 (59%) 104.3 -0.41
23 2017 1602 95.5 -1.10 -1.20 0.792 45.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11 2016 1727 130.2 +0.49 -0.16 0.987 50.0% -47 -68 +30 51.9% -0.04 7–12 (37%) 13–7 (65%) 102.1 +0.25
24 2018 1596 106.9 +0.57 +0.53 0.785 45.3% -6 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–0 1–0 — -0.15 2017 1641 139.6 +1.88 +0.90 1.053 50.9% -40 +250 +124 53.6% +0.27 12–6 (67%) 8–9 (47%) 105.9 +0.27
25 2019 1659 119.6 +0.76 -1.60 0.922 48.6% -70 +2 -17 50.0% -0.06 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -1.03 2018 1660 134.6 -0.19 -1.56 0.928 48.5% -30 +128 +136 43.3% -0.43 7–6 (54%) 1–9 (10%) 95.9 +1.55
26 2020 1647 124.1 +2.54 -0.84 1.162 51.8% -15 — — 54.5% +0.46 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.27 2019 1792 142.0 -0.75 +2.59 1.015 50.3% -55 +76 +1 51.7% +0.16 10–6 (63%) 3–6 (33%) 102.6 -0.98
27 2021 1566 109.4 -0.41 -3.05 0.906 48.0% +7 +39 — 34.2% -0.76 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 +0.82 2020 1716 122.9 -2.25 +0.20 0.897 47.6% -7 — — 38.7% -1.06 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 93.8 -0.03
28 2022 1691 113.4 -0.02 -1.40 0.944 49.3% -36 — — 47.4% -0.58 4–1 (80%) 2–0 — -0.07 2021 1663 121.9 -3.40 +0.92 0.914 48.0% +7 +73 +120 44.2% -0.60 7–8 (47%) 6–4 (60%) 99.6 +0.04
29 2023 1606 124.0 -0.63 -1.56 0.967 49.4% +15 +85 — 41.2% -0.39 2–7 (22%) 1–6 (14%) 88.8 -0.94 2022 1532 110.9 -3.34 -0.44 0.850 46.4% +44 +60 — 32.1% -1.54 3–3 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 98.3 -0.20
30 2024 1546 100.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1415 89.5 -4.20 -2.56 0.665 40.3% — — — 11.1% -3.33 0–1 — — +0.25
31 2025 1653 102.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — 0.00 2024 1436 92.2 -2.56 -0.75 0.653 41.2% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.03
32 2026 1572 108.4 +0.39 +2.50 0.771 44.4% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.11 2025 1429 105.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1375 98.9 -2.14 -0.55 0.979 49.5% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.15
Career — 1743 121.9 +0.93 -1.93 0.961 49.2% -2 -4 -11 44.3% -0.37 26–29 (47%) 15–23 (39%) 98.1 -0.82 — 1930 132.4 -0.23 -0.27 0.960 49.2% -22 +39 +56 47.2% -0.25 74–74 (50%) 55–58 (49%) 101.7 +0.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.