H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Madison Brengle H2H: 0-1

Madison Brengle holds a 1–0 lead over Anna-Lena Friedsam in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Madison Brengle leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Madison Brengle won the 2015 Japan Women's Open first round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna-Lena Friedsam
Germany Age 32 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Madison Brengle
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Madison Brengle #42 6-3 6-1 Anna-Lena Friedsam #108 Match data Sep 17, 2015* R32 Japan Women's Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna-Lena Friedsam #251 #45 1,160 1,743 62 84 42.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Madison Brengle #178 #35 1,324 1,722 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Madison Brengle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,501 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,456 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,456 0 0
20 2014 7–10 41.2% #85 1,539 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,446 0 0
21 2015 11–14 44.0% #95 1,582 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,459 0 0
22 2016 15–14 51.7% #67 1,645 0 0 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,443 0 0
23 2017 0–1 0.0% #507 1,601 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2018 1–2 33.3% #483 1,596 0 0 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,473 0 0
25 2019 7–9 43.8% #145 1,658 0 0 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,622 0 0
26 2020 5–4 55.6% #111 1,646 0 0 2016 16–23 41.0% #73 1,591 0 0
27 2021 5–11 31.2% #140 1,566 0 0 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,654 0 0
28 2022 4–3 57.1% #120 1,690 0 0 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,605 0 0
29 2023 7–14 33.3% #135 1,605 0 0 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,643 0 0
31 2025 0–1 0.0% #154 1,652 0 0 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0
32 2026 0–1 0.0% #251 1,571 0 0 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,630 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,583 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Madison Brengle
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2014 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 7 9 16 43.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 6 5 11 54.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2015 19 16 35 54.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2020 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
27 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2022 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2023 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
32 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 36 44 80 45.0% 18 28 46 39.1% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — 65 103 168 38.7% 17 31 48 35.4% 12 18 30 40.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 129/145 of Anna-Lena Friedsam's and 225/246 of Madison Brengle's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Madison Brengle
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/4 0.8 3.0 60.2% 57.4% 40.8% 48.9% 50.7% 50.5% 41.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/3 0.0 3.0 66.3% 49.4% 35.3% 12.5% 63.6% 45.2% 37.3%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 3/3 0.0 3.7 61.8% 56.2% 38.6% 41.1% 37.6% 49.3% 43.5%
20 2014 17/17 4.1 4.2 59.9% 64.7% 46.0% 49.9% 55.8% 56.9% 42.6% 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 53.7% 44.4% 38.7% 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 47.2%
21 2015 13/25 3.2 4.8 62.7% 64.0% 48.7% 45.1% 40.6% 58.1% 40.1% 2011 2/2 0.5 3.5 63.9% 56.3% 44.7% 38.9% 40.0% 52.0% 35.6%
22 2016 29/29 4.1 2.7 64.0% 66.8% 48.7% 55.2% 47.6% 60.2% 38.8% 2012 1/1 5.0 8.0 65.2% 61.3% 35.0% 30.0% 83.3% 52.2% 41.7%
23 2017 1/1 1.0 1.0 66.2% 51.0% 50.0% 61.5% 66.7% 50.6% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 3/3 0.7 3.3 67.6% 52.3% 49.5% 65.9% 60.0% 52.0% 37.7% 2014 7/8 0.7 3.0 66.2% 62.5% 42.8% 49.4% 47.3% 55.7% 44.3%
25 2019 16/16 1.4 3.6 67.0% 62.6% 46.2% 56.0% 50.1% 56.9% 39.8% 2015 35/51 1.7 1.9 66.0% 61.5% 48.8% 42.8% 46.6% 57.2% 41.3%
26 2020 9/9 2.3 2.4 69.6% 67.9% 51.0% 45.4% 37.7% 62.7% 43.3% 2016 37/39 0.9 2.2 68.5% 56.8% 45.7% 46.0% 54.9% 53.2% 43.1%
27 2021 14/16 3.4 3.6 64.3% 63.5% 43.8% 55.2% 37.7% 56.5% 39.4% 2017 28/28 0.1 2.5 73.3% 54.5% 39.2% 43.7% 45.2% 50.6% 44.1%
28 2022 5/7 4.4 4.4 66.0% 62.0% 45.6% 57.1% 64.1% 56.3% 41.2% 2018 14/14 0.4 2.7 66.6% 50.4% 43.5% 42.0% 45.0% 48.4% 43.5%
29 2023 21/21 3.3 3.0 66.8% 62.2% 45.3% 54.4% 54.5% 56.6% 42.0% 2019 18/18 0.2 2.2 73.8% 51.9% 37.5% 39.8% 54.6% 48.3% 47.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 6/6 0.2 3.7 72.6% 50.8% 44.5% 45.3% 38.1% 49.0% 48.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/20 0.0 3.1 74.5% 55.6% 39.8% 42.5% 48.0% 51.4% 44.1%
32 2026 1/1 3.0 3.0 70.0% 50.0% 46.7% 41.7% 55.6% 49.0% 39.3% 2022 27/28 0.4 2.9 73.1% 55.8% 39.7% 41.5% 47.1% 51.3% 44.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 20/20 0.3 2.7 75.1% 54.6% 41.7% 40.9% 51.5% 51.4% 43.0%
Career — 129/146 3.3 3.4 64.8% 63.9% 47.0% 53.0% 48.8% 57.8% 40.5% — 225/246 0.6 2.6 70.3% 55.9% 42.5% 42.8% 49.1% 52.0% 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Madison Brengle
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1502 110.8 0.00 +0.02 0.829 46.5% +15 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1457 92.1 -3.04 -1.39 0.681 41.4% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.43
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1456 101.5 -2.95 -0.91 0.858 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 0–1 — +0.07
20 2014 1540 113.8 +0.51 -1.51 0.986 49.8% +14 -1 — 43.9% -0.29 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 100.5 -0.25 2010 1447 99.2 -3.58 -2.65 0.810 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
21 2015 1583 117.4 -0.11 -1.37 0.957 49.5% +1 -45 — 45.6% -0.30 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 100.4 +0.50 2011 1459 101.5 -2.09 -1.94 0.741 44.6% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.03
22 2016 1646 122.7 +3.29 -3.20 0.976 49.4% -4 -78 -8 49.2% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -0.34 2012 1444 99.4 -2.21 +0.67 0.871 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.16
23 2017 1602 95.5 -1.10 -1.20 0.792 45.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 1596 106.9 +0.57 +0.53 0.785 45.3% -6 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–0 1–0 — -0.15 2014 1474 113.6 -0.29 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +30 — — 42.9% -0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.14
25 2019 1659 119.6 +0.76 -1.60 0.922 48.6% -70 +2 -17 50.0% -0.06 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -1.03 2015 1622 128.9 -0.60 -0.18 0.964 49.3% +5 -83 — 48.7% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 100.8 +0.20
26 2020 1647 124.1 +2.54 -0.84 1.162 51.8% -15 — — 54.5% +0.46 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.27 2016 1592 127.1 -1.99 +0.54 0.921 48.3% +5 -74 +30 42.4% -0.75 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -1.69
27 2021 1566 109.4 -0.41 -3.05 0.906 48.0% +7 +39 — 34.2% -0.76 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 +0.82 2017 1654 130.5 -4.01 +1.14 0.892 47.3% -26 -55 -1 38.2% -0.78 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -1.75
28 2022 1691 113.4 -0.02 -1.40 0.944 49.3% -36 — — 47.4% -0.58 4–1 (80%) 2–0 — -0.07 2018 1605 118.6 -4.52 +0.81 0.843 45.8% -20 -29 — 33.3% -1.36 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -1.35
29 2023 1606 124.0 -0.63 -1.56 0.967 49.4% +15 +85 — 41.2% -0.39 2–7 (22%) 1–6 (14%) 88.8 -0.94 2019 1601 115.2 -5.23 +2.99 0.913 47.8% -45 -25 — 42.1% -0.68 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.28
30 2024 1546 100.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1644 121.9 -2.92 +1.95 0.947 48.8% -1 — — 42.9% -1.07 0–2 2–0 — -0.11
31 2025 1653 102.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — 0.00 2021 1645 119.5 -3.17 +0.46 0.907 47.7% +15 -91 +15 34.8% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.62
32 2026 1572 108.4 +0.39 +2.50 0.771 44.4% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.11 2022 1631 135.0 -3.81 +1.21 0.902 47.6% +61 -46 -100 42.6% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.90
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1583 118.6 -4.39 -0.51 0.886 47.1% +13 +7 -81 34.9% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1571 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1521 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1743 121.9 +0.93 -1.93 0.961 49.2% -2 -4 -11 44.3% -0.37 26–29 (47%) 15–23 (39%) 98.1 -0.82 — 1723 129.4 -2.95 +0.67 0.906 47.8% +6 -59 -13 40.6% -0.76 27–45 (38%) 25–22 (53%) 98.9 -2.76

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.