H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Natalia Vikhlyantseva H2H: 0-1
Natalia Vikhlyantseva holds a 1–0 lead over Anna-Lena Friedsam in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Natalia Vikhlyantseva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natalia Vikhlyantseva won the 2015 Shenzhen third round 2-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2015* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | #227 | #45 | 1,160 | 1,740 | 61 | 83 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Natalia Vikhlyantseva | #1,034 | #54 | 1,070 | 1,693 | 34 | 56 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #85 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #95 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #134 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #483 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #195 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #111 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #140 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #135 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |