H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Zarina Diyas H2H: 1-0

Anna-Lena Friedsam holds a 1–0 lead over Zarina Diyas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna-Lena Friedsam leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anna-Lena Friedsam won the 2016 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anna-Lena Friedsam
Germany Age 32 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Zarina Diyas
Kazakhstan Age 32 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anna-Lena Friedsam #57 6-4 6-0 Zarina Diyas #99 Match data Jun 29, 2016* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anna-Lena Friedsam #253 #45 1,160 1,743 62 83 42.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Zarina Diyas #437 #31 1,495 1,756 99 128 43.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Zarina Diyas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2009 2–1 66.7% #242 1,528 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2010 2–4 33.3% #172 1,539 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2011 1–4 20.0% #227 1,504 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 0–2 0.0% #264 1,477 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 1–1 50.0% #163 1,477 0 0
20 2014 7–10 41.2% #85 1,539 0 0 2014 20–14 58.8% #33 1,682 0 0
21 2015 11–14 44.0% #95 1,582 0 0 2015 20–27 42.6% #52 1,560 0 0
22 2016 15–14 51.7% #67 1,645 0 0 2016 8–12 40.0% #150 1,552 0 0
23 2017 0–1 0.0% #507 1,601 0 0 2017 7–4 63.6% #66 1,665 0 1
24 2018 1–2 33.3% #483 1,596 0 0 2018 13–19 40.6% #89 1,717 0 1
25 2019 7–9 43.8% #145 1,658 0 0 2019 7–13 35.0% #77 1,704 0 1
26 2020 5–4 55.6% #111 1,646 0 0 2020 5–6 45.5% #80 1,659 0 1
27 2021 5–11 31.2% #140 1,565 0 0 2021 13–17 43.3% #102 1,688 0 1
28 2022 4–3 57.1% #120 1,690 0 0 2022 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,680 0 1
29 2023 7–14 33.3% #135 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — 2024 0–2 0.0% #382 1,631 0 1
31 2025 0–1 0.0% #154 1,652 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #437 1,545 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Zarina Diyas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 15 10 25 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2015 7 9 16 43.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 11 17 28 39.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
22 2016 6 5 11 54.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
24 2018 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 9 11 20 45.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2020 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 8 10 18 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2022 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2023 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2025 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 36 43 79 45.6% 18 28 46 39.1% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — 68 85 153 44.4% 19 30 49 38.8% 12 13 25 48.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/144 of Anna-Lena Friedsam's and 217/227 of Zarina Diyas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Zarina Diyas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/3 3.0 2.5 53.3% 69.6% 41.1% 60.7% 64.6% 56.3% 58.9%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 6/6 1.8 5.8 57.9% 62.6% 42.3% 41.2% 52.3% 53.9% 40.8%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 5/5 2.6 4.2 61.8% 61.5% 40.9% 48.2% 59.0% 54.1% 40.1%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 2/2 0.0 7.5 42.5% 60.7% 29.5% 23.6% 45.0% 41.7% 43.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 2/2 4.0 3.0 68.2% 67.7% 55.4% 61.1% 72.7% 64.6% 35.8%
20 2014 17/17 4.1 4.2 59.9% 64.7% 46.0% 49.9% 55.8% 56.9% 42.6% 2014 32/34 1.6 3.1 68.2% 58.4% 47.3% 49.4% 51.1% 55.1% 45.8%
21 2015 13/25 3.2 4.8 62.7% 64.0% 48.7% 45.1% 40.6% 58.1% 40.1% 2015 41/47 1.2 3.3 71.2% 57.9% 47.0% 48.3% 51.6% 54.7% 44.1%
22 2016 29/29 4.1 2.7 64.0% 66.8% 48.7% 55.2% 47.6% 60.2% 38.8% 2016 20/20 2.6 2.6 70.3% 60.5% 41.6% 48.5% 49.8% 54.9% 43.9%
23 2017 1/1 1.0 1.0 66.2% 51.0% 50.0% 61.5% 66.7% 50.6% 39.1% 2017 11/11 3.3 3.5 68.1% 64.5% 46.2% 53.5% 57.0% 58.7% 45.1%
24 2018 3/3 0.7 3.3 67.6% 52.3% 49.5% 65.9% 60.0% 52.0% 37.7% 2018 32/32 2.2 3.0 67.3% 61.4% 48.3% 52.6% 44.3% 56.7% 42.8%
25 2019 16/16 1.4 3.6 67.0% 62.6% 46.2% 56.0% 50.1% 56.9% 39.8% 2019 20/20 0.9 2.4 69.6% 59.4% 44.8% 45.3% 36.7% 55.0% 42.1%
26 2020 9/9 2.3 2.4 69.6% 67.9% 51.0% 45.4% 37.7% 62.7% 43.3% 2020 11/11 1.6 2.8 74.3% 57.0% 47.6% 53.8% 48.6% 54.4% 44.2%
27 2021 14/16 3.4 3.6 64.3% 63.5% 43.8% 55.2% 37.7% 56.5% 39.4% 2021 29/30 1.5 3.1 67.2% 60.0% 42.6% 48.1% 46.7% 54.3% 41.3%
28 2022 5/7 4.4 4.4 66.0% 62.0% 45.6% 57.1% 64.1% 56.3% 41.2% 2022 1/1 0.0 1.0 70.2% 56.2% 67.7% 66.7% 20.0% 59.6% 33.6%
29 2023 21/21 3.3 3.0 66.8% 62.2% 45.3% 54.4% 54.5% 56.6% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 2/2 0.0 1.5 70.9% 46.7% 31.4% 45.5% 38.8% 42.6% 40.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 1/1 1.0 3.0 68.3% 61.0% 31.6% 55.6% 20.0% 51.7% 36.4%
Career — 128/145 3.3 3.4 64.8% 64.0% 47.0% 53.1% 48.7% 57.9% 40.5% — 217/227 1.7 3.1 68.4% 59.8% 45.4% 49.3% 48.4% 55.1% 43.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anna-Lena Friedsam Zarina Diyas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1528 105.5 +0.98 +1.13 1.348 57.6% — +48 — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.06
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1539 114.4 +0.14 -1.62 0.883 47.6% +19 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -0.06
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1505 103.6 -1.72 -1.18 0.875 47.5% +17 — — 33.3% -1.08 0–2 — — +0.16
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1477 95.3 -2.37 -3.62 0.739 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1478 100.3 -1.99 -0.40 1.012 50.7% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–2 — +0.31
20 2014 1539 113.8 +0.51 -1.51 0.986 49.8% +15 0 — 43.9% -0.29 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 100.5 -0.25 2014 1683 130.0 -0.83 +1.87 1.021 50.5% -29 -121 -28 57.5% +0.52 7–2 (78%) 7–4 (64%) 111.0 +0.75
21 2015 1583 117.4 -0.11 -1.37 0.957 49.5% +1 -45 — 45.6% -0.30 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 100.4 +0.50 2015 1561 125.0 -2.62 +2.02 0.975 49.5% -15 -26 +133 47.0% -0.32 3–9 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 91.8 +1.00
22 2016 1646 122.7 +3.29 -3.20 0.976 49.4% -4 -78 -8 49.2% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -0.35 2016 1553 119.4 -0.44 +0.63 0.974 49.5% +1 -18 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 +0.38
23 2017 1602 95.5 -1.10 -1.20 0.792 45.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.11 2017 1665 121.5 +1.12 +0.16 1.091 52.1% +6 — +15 57.7% +0.73 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.1 +0.69
24 2018 1596 106.9 +0.57 +0.53 0.785 45.3% -6 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–0 1–0 — -0.15 2018 1718 138.2 -0.01 -0.24 0.989 49.8% +12 -125 — 44.9% -0.07 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -2.35
25 2019 1658 119.7 +0.76 -1.59 0.922 48.6% -69 +3 -16 50.0% -0.06 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -1.03 2019 1704 128.4 -1.13 -1.09 0.937 48.5% +30 — — 44.2% -0.58 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.02
26 2020 1647 124.1 +2.54 -0.84 1.162 51.8% -15 — — 54.5% +0.46 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.27 2020 1660 115.9 -0.51 +0.34 0.969 49.6% +68 -136 — 44.8% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -0.43
27 2021 1566 109.4 -0.41 -3.05 0.906 48.0% +7 +39 — 34.2% -0.76 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 +0.82 2021 1688 125.7 -1.93 -1.44 0.902 47.7% +47 -117 -89 43.8% -0.62 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -1.46
28 2022 1691 113.4 -0.02 -1.40 0.944 49.3% -36 — — 47.4% -0.58 4–1 (80%) 2–0 — -0.07 2022 1681 107.4 -0.79 +5.23 0.833 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–1 — -0.23
29 2023 1606 124.0 -0.63 -1.56 0.967 49.4% +15 +85 — 41.2% -0.39 2–7 (22%) 1–6 (14%) 88.8 -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2024 1545 100.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1631 100.1 -0.16 -2.90 0.697 41.4% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.15
31 2025 1653 102.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — 0.00 2025 1549 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2026 1557 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1546 107.0 -0.57 -1.68 0.752 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12
Career — 1743 121.9 +0.93 -1.96 0.963 49.2% -2 -4 -11 44.4% -0.36 26–28 (48%) 15–22 (41%) 98.5 -0.75 — 1756 131.4 -1.07 +0.30 0.966 49.3% +8 -81 +46 46.2% -0.25 32–36 (47%) 22–29 (43%) 97.4 -0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.