H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Arantxa Parra Santonja vs Mara Santangelo H2H: 1-1
Arantxa Parra Santonja and Mara Santangelo are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mara Santangelo leads 1–0 on clay, while Arantxa Parra Santonja leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mara Santangelo won the 2006 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 45
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2006* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Mara Santangelo | 6-4 6-1 | Arantxa Parra Santonja | Match data |
| Oct 14, 2004* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Arantxa Parra Santonja | 6-3 1-6 6-4 | Mara Santangelo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arantxa Parra Santonja | #858 | #46 | 1,231 | 1,625 | 71 | 120 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mara Santangelo | #970 | #27 | 918 | 1,824 | 74 | 93 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arantxa Parra Santonja | Mara Santangelo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2003 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2005 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #109 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #175 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #86 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #88 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #31 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #35 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2010 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #134 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #342 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |