H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Arina Rodionova vs Carla Suárez Navarro
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Arina Rodionova vs Carla Suárez Navarro.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 36
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 37
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arina Rodionova | #439 | #97 | 761 | 1,560 | 17 | 46 | 27.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Carla Suárez Navarro | #342 | #6 | 4,015 | 2,022 | 339 | 247 | 57.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arina Rodionova | Carla Suárez Navarro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #266 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #49 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #17 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #17 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2017 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 1,812 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #169 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2021 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #152 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,406 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |