H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Arina Rodionova vs Kiki Bertens H2H: 0-1
Kiki Bertens holds a 1–0 lead over Arina Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kiki Bertens leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kiki Bertens won the 2020 Australian Open second round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 36
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2020* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Kiki Bertens | 6-3 7-5 | Arina Rodionova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arina Rodionova | #439 | #97 | 761 | 1,560 | 17 | 46 | 27.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kiki Bertens | #25 | #4 | 5,430 | 2,015 | 214 | 168 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arina Rodionova | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #266 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,912 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2017 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #169 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #152 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,406 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |