H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Arina Rodionova vs Sara Errani
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Arina Rodionova vs Sara Errani.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 36
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arina Rodionova | #439 | #97 | 761 | 1,560 | 17 | 46 | 27.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sara Errani | #461 | #5 | 5,835 | 2,024 | 384 | 299 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Arina Rodionova | Sara Errani | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #266 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #42 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #47 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #45 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #6 | 1,901 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #7 | 1,894 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2017 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #14 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #169 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #20 | 1,752 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,625 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #144 | 1,650 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2021 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #152 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #112 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,406 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #198 | 1,567 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 9 |
| 35 | 2025 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #109 | 1,597 | 0 | 9 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #105 | 1,550 | 0 | 9 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #105 | 1,699 | 0 | 9 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,594 | 0 | 9 |