H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Aryna Sabalenka holds an 8–1 lead over Qinwen Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Aryna Sabalenka leads 7–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Aryna Sabalenka won the 2026 Miami Open fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | 6-3 6-4 | Qinwen Zheng | Match data | Mar 23, 2026 | R16 | Miami Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Qinwen Zheng | Match data | Jun 3, 2025 | QF | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Qinwen Zheng | 6-4 6-3 | Aryna Sabalenka | Match data | May 14, 2025 | QF | Italian Open | WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 6-2 7-5 | Qinwen Zheng | Match data | Mar 26, 2025 | QF | Miami Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 6-3 6-4 | Qinwen Zheng | Match data | Nov 4, 2024 | RR | WTA Finals | WTA Finals | Hard |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | Qinwen Zheng | Match data | Oct 13, 2024* | F | Wuhan Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 6-1 6-2 | Qinwen Zheng | Match data | Sep 5, 2024* | QF | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 6-3 6-2 | Qinwen Zheng | Match data | Jan 28, 2024* | F | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 6-1 6-4 | Qinwen Zheng | Match data | Sep 7, 2023* | QF | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | Olympics | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | #1 | #1 | 12,420 | 2,324 | 416 | 145 | 74.2% | 4 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 24 |
| Qinwen Zheng | #121 | #4 | 5,340 | 2,105 | 141 | 82 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Aryna Sabalenka | Qinwen Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #96 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #28 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #13 | 1,963 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #15 | 1,964 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2019 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #11 | 1,938 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #5 | 2,089 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2020 | 28–9 | 75.7% | #10 | 2,006 | 0 | 8 | 2025 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #24 | 2,005 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2021 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #2 | 1,975 | 0 | 10 | 2026 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #121 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2022 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #5 | 1,955 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #2 | 2,082 | 1 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,173 | 3 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 64–12 | 84.2% | #1 | 2,227 | 4 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 46–9 | 83.6% | #1 | 2,185 | 4 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Aryna Sabalenka | Qinwen Zheng | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2022 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 20 | 2018 | 32 | 12 | 44 | 72.7% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2023 | 24 | 13 | 37 | 64.9% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2019 | 29 | 12 | 41 | 70.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2024 | 30 | 11 | 41 | 73.2% | 17 | 4 | 21 | 81.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 2020 | 23 | 7 | 30 | 76.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 2021 | 25 | 12 | 37 | 67.6% | 13 | 3 | 16 | 81.3% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2026 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 24 | 2022 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 36 | 9 | 45 | 80.0% | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.4% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 40 | 9 | 49 | 81.6% | 15 | 4 | 19 | 78.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 40 | 7 | 47 | 85.1% | 17 | 3 | 20 | 85.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 33 | 4 | 37 | 89.2% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 286 | 91 | 377 | 75.9% | 90 | 33 | 123 | 73.2% | 40 | 21 | 61 | 65.6% | — | 88 | 49 | 137 | 64.2% | 46 | 19 | 65 | 70.8% | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 533/563 of Aryna Sabalenka's and 206/223 of Qinwen Zheng's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Aryna Sabalenka | Qinwen Zheng | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4/4 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 44.2% | 76.6% | 41.4% | 64.5% | 49.6% | 56.8% | 34.5% |
| 19 | 2017 | 12/14 | 5.3 | 3.7 | 58.2% | 67.6% | 47.5% | 61.1% | 52.8% | 59.8% | 45.6% | 2022 | 37/39 | 6.8 | 5.7 | 52.2% | 76.1% | 45.3% | 61.3% | 43.8% | 61.5% | 42.9% |
| 20 | 2018 | 58/64 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 59.3% | 69.7% | 49.1% | 61.4% | 44.8% | 61.2% | 42.1% | 2023 | 52/55 | 6.6 | 4.2 | 51.4% | 74.7% | 45.7% | 59.8% | 48.0% | 60.6% | 43.5% |
| 21 | 2019 | 56/57 | 4.4 | 6.2 | 61.4% | 69.5% | 46.4% | 58.6% | 48.7% | 60.6% | 45.2% | 2024 | 59/65 | 6.7 | 3.6 | 52.9% | 76.9% | 47.4% | 57.6% | 49.0% | 63.0% | 44.1% |
| 22 | 2020 | 37/37 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 62.2% | 68.5% | 48.4% | 52.0% | 51.2% | 61.0% | 46.1% | 2025 | 26/32 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 55.3% | 70.7% | 46.4% | 49.9% | 55.0% | 59.9% | 45.6% |
| 23 | 2021 | 59/63 | 6.0 | 5.4 | 58.3% | 70.8% | 49.9% | 63.5% | 52.0% | 62.0% | 45.3% | 2026 | 28/28 | 8.2 | 4.7 | 52.8% | 74.5% | 47.8% | 56.6% | 46.6% | 61.8% | 38.3% |
| 24 | 2022 | 54/55 | 4.7 | 7.9 | 60.6% | 67.9% | 42.9% | 50.4% | 47.0% | 58.0% | 45.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 69/70 | 5.9 | 4.1 | 61.2% | 74.4% | 50.3% | 61.9% | 46.3% | 65.1% | 45.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 70/71 | 4.4 | 2.9 | 62.8% | 71.1% | 51.5% | 63.6% | 50.6% | 63.8% | 46.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 63/77 | 4.0 | 2.3 | 63.3% | 69.5% | 53.0% | 61.0% | 51.6% | 63.2% | 46.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 55/55 | 5.0 | 2.3 | 64.8% | 72.4% | 54.4% | 59.9% | 48.5% | 66.0% | 45.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 533/563 | 4.8 | 4.4 | 61.4% | 70.5% | 49.7% | 59.7% | 49.0% | 62.4% | 45.3% | — | 206/223 | 6.6 | 4.3 | 52.5% | 75.1% | 46.4% | 57.8% | 48.2% | 61.5% | 42.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Aryna Sabalenka | Qinwen Zheng | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1493 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 1499 | 99.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1560 | 120.6 | +0.23 | -1.61 | 0.799 | 46.5% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.25 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.10 |
| 19 | 2017 | 1674 | 126.8 | +1.97 | +0.43 | 1.134 | 52.8% | +32 | — | — | 65.6% | +1.03 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–2 (33%) | 96.9 | +0.60 | 2022 | 1830 | 148.1 | +4.12 | +1.19 | 1.114 | 52.1% | -26 | -69 | -222 | 52.9% | +0.10 | 9–8 (53%) | 9–5 (64%) | 108.5 | -0.97 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1963 | 152.3 | +4.32 | +0.38 | 1.084 | 51.7% | +5 | -387 | -239 | 60.4% | +0.62 | 19–7 (73%) | 13–6 (68%) | 113.7 | -2.90 | 2023 | 1965 | 158.6 | +3.42 | +1.11 | 1.104 | 51.9% | +22 | -50 | -426 | 59.4% | +0.73 | 16–6 (73%) | 7–4 (64%) | 110.5 | -0.43 |
| 21 | 2019 | 1938 | 149.8 | +3.72 | +2.29 | 1.148 | 53.1% | +36 | -321 | -241 | 59.5% | +0.89 | 11–8 (58%) | 5–7 (42%) | 98.6 | +0.95 | 2024 | 2090 | 165.0 | +5.64 | +2.11 | 1.193 | 53.3% | +1 | +11 | -537 | 66.0% | +1.35 | 19–5 (79%) | 7–7 (50%) | 108.7 | +0.04 |
| 22 | 2020 | 2007 | 154.4 | +3.98 | +2.79 | 1.182 | 53.5% | +20 | -307 | — | 67.0% | +1.13 | 11–5 (69%) | 5–7 (42%) | 99.3 | -0.98 | 2025 | 2006 | 154.2 | +2.79 | +2.67 | 1.138 | 52.7% | +23 | +110 | -458 | 62.5% | +0.82 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–4 (50%) | 96.8 | -0.14 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1975 | 161.3 | +5.49 | +3.40 | 1.194 | 53.7% | -3 | -39 | -109 | 68.9% | +1.37 | 10–14 (42%) | 9–6 (60%) | 95.5 | -0.98 | 2026 | 1926 | 146.7 | +3.33 | -2.30 | 1.002 | 49.9% | +101 | +128 | -369 | 50.0% | +0.04 | 10–6 (63%) | 4–2 (67%) | 104.2 | -1.11 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1956 | 152.8 | +1.65 | +3.23 | 1.078 | 51.5% | -5 | -17 | -80 | 56.6% | +0.40 | 15–13 (54%) | 9–5 (64%) | 102.3 | -1.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 2082 | 170.8 | +8.10 | +3.76 | 1.309 | 55.2% | +25 | +2 | -99 | 75.3% | +1.71 | 10–6 (63%) | 13–6 (68%) | 105.4 | -2.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 2174 | 173.0 | +7.39 | +4.30 | 1.275 | 54.8% | +37 | -17 | — | 75.8% | +1.72 | 12–9 (57%) | 7–5 (58%) | 95.7 | -2.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 2228 | 172.3 | +6.38 | +4.36 | 1.266 | 54.8% | +54 | +38 | -80 | 78.4% | +1.81 | 12–6 (67%) | 22–3 (88%) | 112.7 | -1.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 2185 | 170.4 | +7.81 | +3.66 | 1.331 | 55.3% | +150 | +21 | -55 | 81.1% | +1.84 | 5–7 (42%) | 12–5 (71%) | 95.2 | -0.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2325 | 167.7 | +5.54 | +3.13 | 1.206 | 53.8% | +36 | -73 | -132 | 69.4% | +1.29 | 106–78 (58%) | 96–52 (65%) | 106.9 | -1.83 | — | 2106 | 160.3 | +4.03 | +1.09 | 1.114 | 52.1% | +15 | +21 | -383 | 58.8% | +0.69 | 57–30 (66%) | 31–23 (57%) | 113.3 | -1.22 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Rybakina | 10 | 8 | 18 | Sep 12, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 10 | 4 | 14 | Sep 10, 2026 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 7 | 6 | 13 | Mar 28, 2026 | H2H |
| Elise Mertens | 11 | 2 | 13 | Jul 6, 2025 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 5 | 8 | 13 | Jun 5, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | 1 | 8 | 9 | Mar 23, 2026 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 2 | 6 | 8 | Sep 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Liudmila Samsonova | 3 | 4 | 7 | Jun 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 1 | 5 | 6 | Sep 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 29, 2026 | H2H |