H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:30 UTC
Ashleigh Barty vs Eugenie Bouchard H2H: 2-0
Ashleigh Barty holds a 2–0 lead over Eugenie Bouchard in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ashleigh Barty leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ashleigh Barty won the 2018 Wimbledon second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 30
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 32
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2018* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Ashleigh Barty | 6-4 7-5 | Eugenie Bouchard | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2017* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Ashleigh Barty | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | Eugenie Bouchard | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashleigh Barty | #1 | #1 | 10,185 | 2,199 | 191 | 70 | 73.2% | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 15 |
| Eugenie Bouchard | #1,002 | #5 | 4,793 | 1,926 | 156 | 144 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ashleigh Barty | Eugenie Bouchard | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #190 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #305 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #223 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #147 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #32 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #272 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #7 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #17 | 1,888 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #49 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,964 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #46 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 48–12 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,070 | 1 | 7 | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 12–3 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,082 | 1 | 8 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #87 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 43–7 | 86.0% | #1 | 2,142 | 2 | 13 | 2019 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #215 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 11–0 | 100.0% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 15 | 2020 | 10–4 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #253 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #326 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #287 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #1002 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |