H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ashleigh Barty vs Stefanie Voegele H2H: 2-0
Ashleigh Barty holds a 2–0 lead over Stefanie Voegele in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ashleigh Barty leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Ashleigh Barty won the 2018 Wimbledon first round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 30
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 36
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2018* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Ashleigh Barty | 7-5 6-3 | Stefanie Voegele | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2018* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Ashleigh Barty | 6-3 6-3 | Stefanie Voegele | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashleigh Barty | #1 | #1 | 10,185 | 2,199 | 191 | 70 | 73.2% | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 15 |
| Stefanie Voegele | #1,075 | #42 | 1,255 | 1,712 | 100 | 175 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ashleigh Barty | Stefanie Voegele | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #190 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #223 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #272 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #135 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #17 | 1,888 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 40–18 | 69.0% | #15 | 1,964 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #92 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 48–12 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,070 | 1 | 7 | 2013 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 12–3 | 80.0% | #1 | 2,082 | 1 | 8 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 43–7 | 86.0% | #1 | 2,142 | 2 | 13 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #119 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 11–0 | 100.0% | #1 | 2,199 | 3 | 15 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #119 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #260 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |