H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Ashleigh Barty vs Zarina Diyas H2H: 2-0

Ashleigh Barty holds a 2–0 lead over Zarina Diyas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ashleigh Barty leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ashleigh Barty won the 2019 US Open first round 1-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ashleigh Barty
AUS Age 30 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Zarina Diyas
Kazakhstan Age 32 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ashleigh Barty #2 1-6 6-3 6-2 Zarina Diyas #80 Match data Aug 28, 2019* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Ashleigh Barty #199 7-6(3) 6-4 Zarina Diyas #242 Match data Mar 1, 2013* R16 Kuala Lumpur International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ashleigh Barty #1 #1 10,185 2,180 197 72 73.2% 3 3 2 5 2 15
Zarina Diyas #437 #31 1,495 1,756 99 128 43.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ashleigh Barty Zarina Diyas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2009 2–1 66.7% #242 1,528 0 0
16 2012 0–4 0.0% #175 1,469 0 0 2010 2–4 33.3% #172 1,539 0 0
17 2013 4–5 44.4% #190 1,519 0 0 2011 1–4 20.0% #227 1,504 0 0
18 2014 1–6 14.3% #223 1,510 0 0 2012 0–2 0.0% #264 1,477 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 1–1 50.0% #163 1,477 0 0
20 2016 2–1 66.7% #272 1,595 0 0 2014 20–14 58.8% #33 1,682 0 0
21 2017 30–14 68.2% #17 1,891 0 1 2015 20–27 42.6% #52 1,560 0 0
22 2018 42–19 68.9% #15 1,973 0 3 2016 8–12 40.0% #150 1,552 0 0
23 2019 52–12 81.2% #1 2,082 1 7 2017 7–4 63.6% #66 1,665 0 1
24 2020 12–3 80.0% #1 2,083 1 8 2018 13–19 40.6% #89 1,717 0 1
25 2021 43–8 84.3% #1 2,117 2 13 2019 7–13 35.0% #77 1,704 0 1
26 2022 11–0 100.0% #1 2,180 3 15 2020 5–6 45.5% #80 1,659 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2021 13–17 43.3% #102 1,688 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,680 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2024 0–2 0.0% #382 1,631 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #437 1,545 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ashleigh Barty Zarina Diyas
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
16 2012 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
17 2013 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2016 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2014 15 10 25 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2017 22 9 31 71.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2015 11 17 28 39.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
22 2018 25 11 36 69.4% 7 5 12 58.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2019 33 9 42 78.6% 11 2 13 84.6% 8 1 9 88.9% 2017 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2020 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 9 11 20 45.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2021 22 4 26 84.6% 14 4 18 77.8% 7 0 7 100.0% 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2022 11 0 11 100.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 8 10 18 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 46 175 73.7% 35 17 52 67.3% 33 9 42 78.6% — 68 85 153 44.4% 19 30 49 38.8% 12 13 25 48.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 243/269 of Ashleigh Barty's and 217/227 of Zarina Diyas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ashleigh Barty Zarina Diyas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/3 3.0 2.5 53.3% 69.6% 41.1% 60.7% 64.6% 56.3% 58.9%
16 2012 4/4 2.8 5.3 58.7% 60.8% 32.7% 35.0% 43.3% 49.0% 32.0% 2010 6/6 1.8 5.8 57.9% 62.6% 42.3% 41.2% 52.3% 53.9% 40.8%
17 2013 6/9 3.5 2.7 54.3% 65.7% 50.2% 36.3% 44.9% 58.4% 37.5% 2011 5/5 2.6 4.2 61.8% 61.5% 40.9% 48.2% 59.0% 54.1% 40.1%
18 2014 4/7 3.0 3.8 57.5% 63.1% 50.5% 57.1% 56.5% 57.6% 32.7% 2012 2/2 0.0 7.5 42.5% 60.7% 29.5% 23.6% 45.0% 41.7% 43.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 2/2 4.0 3.0 68.2% 67.7% 55.4% 61.1% 72.7% 64.6% 35.8%
20 2016 3/3 6.7 3.7 65.2% 73.9% 47.4% 68.3% 35.5% 64.7% 43.8% 2014 32/34 1.6 3.1 68.2% 58.4% 47.3% 49.4% 51.1% 55.1% 45.8%
21 2017 41/44 5.0 2.9 60.9% 72.5% 50.3% 58.9% 51.7% 63.6% 44.1% 2015 41/47 1.2 3.3 71.2% 57.9% 47.0% 48.3% 51.6% 54.7% 44.1%
22 2018 58/61 4.9 2.9 58.4% 71.9% 53.7% 53.1% 47.3% 64.3% 42.6% 2016 20/20 2.6 2.6 70.3% 60.5% 41.6% 48.5% 49.8% 54.9% 43.9%
23 2019 54/64 6.5 3.2 57.5% 73.7% 52.1% 54.7% 47.4% 64.4% 45.3% 2017 11/11 3.3 3.5 68.1% 64.5% 46.2% 53.5% 57.0% 58.7% 45.1%
24 2020 14/15 5.6 1.9 60.7% 73.5% 49.9% 60.4% 53.0% 64.4% 44.0% 2018 32/32 2.2 3.0 67.3% 61.4% 48.3% 52.6% 44.3% 56.7% 42.8%
25 2021 48/51 6.7 3.3 58.8% 75.8% 49.4% 59.3% 48.7% 64.8% 46.0% 2019 20/20 0.9 2.4 69.6% 59.4% 44.8% 45.3% 36.7% 55.0% 42.1%
26 2022 11/11 7.0 1.7 60.3% 81.1% 58.6% 90.0% 60.2% 72.2% 48.2% 2020 11/11 1.6 2.8 74.3% 57.0% 47.6% 53.8% 48.6% 54.4% 44.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 29/30 1.5 3.1 67.2% 60.0% 42.6% 48.1% 46.7% 54.3% 41.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 0.0 1.0 70.2% 56.2% 67.7% 66.7% 20.0% 59.6% 33.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 2/2 0.0 1.5 70.9% 46.7% 31.4% 45.5% 38.8% 42.6% 40.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 1/1 1.0 3.0 68.3% 61.0% 31.6% 55.6% 20.0% 51.7% 36.4%
Career — 243/269 5.7 3.0 58.9% 73.2% 51.4% 57.3% 49.1% 64.2% 44.0% — 217/227 1.7 3.1 68.4% 59.8% 45.4% 49.3% 48.4% 55.1% 43.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ashleigh Barty Zarina Diyas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1528 105.5 +0.98 +1.13 1.348 57.6% — +48 — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.06
16 2012 1469 97.5 -1.40 -1.92 0.627 41.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.26 2010 1539 114.4 +0.14 -1.62 0.883 47.6% +19 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -0.06
17 2013 1519 110.4 +0.25 -1.62 0.902 47.5% +1 — — 47.6% -1.05 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.14 2011 1505 103.6 -1.72 -1.18 0.875 47.5% +17 — — 33.3% -1.08 0–2 — — +0.16
18 2014 1510 114.8 +1.59 -1.59 0.772 46.2% +7 — — 23.1% -2.15 0–1 0–1 — -0.81 2012 1477 95.3 -2.37 -3.62 0.739 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1478 100.3 -1.99 -0.40 1.012 50.7% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–2 — +0.31
20 2016 1595 108.1 -0.11 +1.91 1.241 53.2% — — +26 57.1% +1.57 1–0 0–2 — -0.09 2014 1683 130.0 -0.83 +1.87 1.021 50.5% -29 -121 -28 57.5% +0.52 7–2 (78%) 7–4 (64%) 111.0 +0.75
21 2017 1892 150.0 +6.11 +1.57 1.211 54.0% -27 -297 -172 61.4% +1.02 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 111.0 -1.16 2015 1561 125.0 -2.62 +2.02 0.975 49.5% -15 -26 +133 47.0% -0.32 3–9 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 91.8 +1.00
22 2018 1973 151.5 +6.83 +0.72 1.194 53.1% -6 -281 -148 65.4% +1.08 10–3 (77%) 4–3 (57%) 108.4 -0.44 2016 1553 119.4 -0.44 +0.63 0.974 49.5% +1 -18 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 +0.38
23 2019 2083 165.1 +6.89 +3.36 1.272 54.6% +1 -186 -124 71.9% +1.58 19–6 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 107.5 -1.06 2017 1665 121.5 +1.12 +0.16 1.091 52.1% +6 — +15 57.7% +0.73 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.1 +0.69
24 2020 2084 154.1 +5.09 +2.45 1.236 54.3% -5 — — 67.6% +1.59 5–1 (83%) 2–3 (40%) 100.7 -0.69 2018 1718 138.2 -0.01 -0.24 0.989 49.8% +12 -125 — 44.9% -0.07 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -2.35
25 2021 2118 162.9 +7.48 +3.74 1.306 55.3% +19 -82 +83 77.0% +1.89 14–3 (82%) 7–4 (64%) 110.2 -0.67 2019 1704 128.4 -1.13 -1.09 0.937 48.5% +30 — — 44.2% -0.58 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.02
26 2022 2181 159.7 +8.99 +4.21 1.735 59.8% +42 — — 95.7% +3.39 1–0 1–0 — -0.08 2020 1660 115.9 -0.51 +0.34 0.969 49.6% +68 -136 — 44.8% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -0.43
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1688 125.7 -1.93 -1.44 0.902 47.7% +47 -117 -89 43.8% -0.62 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -1.46
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1681 107.4 -0.79 +5.23 0.833 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–1 — -0.23
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1631 100.1 -0.16 -2.90 0.697 41.4% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.15
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1549 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1546 107.0 -0.57 -1.68 0.752 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12
Career — 2181 161.7 +6.38 +2.18 1.228 53.9% -1 -180 -96 67.3% +1.27 62–22 (74%) 29–22 (57%) 115.6 -2.03 — 1756 131.4 -1.07 +0.30 0.966 49.3% +8 -81 +46 46.2% -0.25 32–36 (47%) 22–29 (43%) 97.4 -0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.