Ashlyn Krueger
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 8, 2025 | H2H |
| Leylah Fernandez | 3 | 1 | 4 | Mar 22, 2025 | H2H |
| Sofia Kenin | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 22, 2026 | H2H |
| Caty Mcnally | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 31, 2026 | H2H |
| Sara Bejlek | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 2, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Ashlyn Krueger vs Nadia Podoroska H2H: 1-2
Nadia Podoroska holds a 2–1 lead over Ashlyn Krueger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nadia Podoroska leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Podoroska won the 2024 Miami Open first round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
2
3 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nadia Podoroska | 6-4 6-2 | Ashlyn Krueger | Match data | Mar 21, 2024* | R128 | Miami Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Nadia Podoroska | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Ashlyn Krueger | Match data | Mar 8, 2024* | R128 | Indian Wells Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Ashlyn Krueger | 6-2 6-4 | Nadia Podoroska | Match data | Oct 12, 2023* | R32 | Korea Open | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashlyn Krueger | #60 | #29 | 1,549 | 1,876 | 55 | 72 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nadia Podoroska | #449 | #36 | 1,787 | 1,767 | 55 | 81 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ashlyn Krueger | Nadia Podoroska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #532 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2024 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #64 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2025 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #44 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #304 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2026 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #60 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #47 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #67 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–25 | 28.6% | #100 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #471 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #449 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Ashlyn Krueger | Nadia Podoroska | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2021 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2016 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2024 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 38.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2025 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2026 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 39 | 52 | 91 | 42.9% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | — | 31 | 45 | 76 | 40.8% | 19 | 28 | 47 | 40.4% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 115/127 of Ashlyn Krueger's and 131/135 of Nadia Podoroska's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Ashlyn Krueger | Nadia Podoroska | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2021 | 2/2 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 61.2% | 64.2% | 40.5% | 47.8% | 32.5% | 55.2% | 36.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 4/4 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 69.5% | 54.2% | 41.5% | 53.2% | 53.3% | 50.5% | 35.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 16/16 | 2.4 | 3.2 | 63.7% | 67.7% | 46.6% | 47.7% | 44.8% | 60.0% | 42.9% | 2016 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 3.7 | 61.3% | 57.4% | 38.5% | 38.6% | 25.8% | 50.0% | 36.9% |
| 20 | 2024 | 38/38 | 3.2 | 5.1 | 63.0% | 63.2% | 45.0% | 56.1% | 43.8% | 56.3% | 41.6% | 2017 | 6/6 | 0.3 | 4.5 | 64.8% | 46.8% | 41.7% | 37.2% | 30.8% | 44.6% | 40.2% |
| 21 | 2025 | 31/43 | 4.1 | 5.6 | 64.3% | 62.1% | 47.9% | 52.4% | 50.4% | 57.0% | 41.2% | 2018 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 63.2% | 53.8% | 52.5% | 51.8% | 60.6% | 53.4% | 48.3% |
| 22 | 2026 | 24/24 | 4.6 | 4.9 | 65.1% | 65.7% | 44.3% | 60.1% | 47.0% | 57.9% | 41.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 11/11 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 68.6% | 52.6% | 48.3% | 49.7% | 43.7% | 51.2% | 46.7% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 31/34 | 2.5 | 3.7 | 61.1% | 62.3% | 46.9% | 52.9% | 43.9% | 56.0% | 45.6% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8/8 | 1.5 | 5.3 | 63.1% | 66.6% | 45.4% | 56.2% | 44.3% | 59.0% | 42.8% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 31/31 | 1.8 | 4.1 | 61.7% | 60.8% | 42.9% | 52.9% | 56.4% | 54.0% | 40.8% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 34/35 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 65.4% | 58.5% | 40.2% | 50.1% | 40.3% | 52.2% | 40.3% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 5/5 | 2.2 | 4.6 | 66.0% | 59.4% | 50.2% | 40.9% | 17.3% | 54.9% | 36.7% |
| Career | — | 115/127 | 3.7 | 4.9 | 64.1% | 63.8% | 45.7% | 54.5% | 46.5% | 57.1% | 41.3% | — | 131/136 | 1.7 | 3.7 | 63.5% | 59.4% | 44.0% | 50.6% | 44.1% | 53.6% | 42.2% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Ashlyn Krueger | Nadia Podoroska | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2021 | 1453 | 97.0 | +0.25 | -1.18 | 0.822 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 1495 | 115.2 | -0.55 | -1.33 | 0.726 | 43.9% | +6 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.30 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | -0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 1712 | 133.0 | +2.50 | -0.29 | 1.074 | 51.2% | -32 | — | +71 | 50.0% | +0.22 | — | 1–0 | — | -0.59 | 2016 | 1575 | 106.0 | -1.26 | -1.72 | 0.738 | 43.2% | — | — | — | 14.3% | -3.00 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.22 |
| 20 | 2024 | 1767 | 140.8 | -0.51 | -0.83 | 0.952 | 48.9% | -7 | -195 | -3 | 43.5% | -0.43 | 6–10 (38%) | 4–5 (44%) | 96.7 | -0.40 | 2017 | 1609 | 100.8 | -4.92 | -1.96 | 0.726 | 42.0% | — | -7 | — | 33.3% | -1.92 | 2–0 | — | — | -0.05 |
| 21 | 2025 | 1719 | 144.1 | +0.32 | -1.04 | 0.958 | 49.2% | +28 | -103 | -43 | 47.2% | -0.17 | 12–8 (60%) | 6–9 (40%) | 103.3 | -1.66 | 2018 | 1581 | 102.9 | -0.91 | -1.28 | 1.037 | 51.0% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.04 |
| 22 | 2026 | 1790 | 132.9 | +0.70 | -0.98 | 0.980 | 49.6% | -93 | -162 | +224 | 45.5% | -0.18 | 4–3 (57%) | 3–3 (50%) | 102.0 | -0.82 | 2019 | 1510 | 85.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1737 | 123.1 | -2.40 | +1.52 | 0.955 | 49.0% | -106 | +39 | — | 56.0% | +0.04 | 3–0 (100%) | 0–1 | — | -0.19 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1713 | 130.1 | -0.63 | +2.06 | 1.037 | 50.8% | -79 | +84 | -38 | 48.0% | -0.13 | 5–4 (56%) | 7–2 (78%) | 105.0 | +0.71 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1660 | 105.0 | +0.71 | -0.89 | 1.044 | 50.7% | -31 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +0.84 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1670 | 120.5 | -1.86 | -1.71 | 0.886 | 47.7% | -27 | +84 | -50 | 43.2% | -0.43 | 6–6 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.0 | -0.19 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1644 | 121.6 | -3.46 | -2.62 | 0.842 | 46.2% | +35 | -18 | — | 33.3% | -1.16 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–6 (25%) | 93.1 | -0.31 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1641 | 106.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.25 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1614 | 110.8 | +1.33 | -1.66 | 0.814 | 45.1% | — | — | — | 30.8% | -1.54 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.17 |
| Career | — | 1877 | 141.0 | +0.40 | -0.87 | 0.964 | 49.2% | -14 | -147 | +58 | 44.7% | -0.31 | 22–24 (48%) | 15–19 (44%) | 100.1 | -3.11 | — | 1768 | 121.8 | -1.86 | -0.74 | 0.910 | 47.9% | -29 | +39 | -44 | 41.7% | -0.67 | 21–20 (51%) | 14–13 (52%) | 101.1 | +0.15 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Nadia Podoroska
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatjana Maria | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 22, 2024 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 26, 2024 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 3 | 0 | 3 | Sep 20, 2024 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 28, 2024 | H2H |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 23, 2024 | H2H |