H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Barbora Krejcikova vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 2-0
Barbora Krejcikova holds a 2–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbora Krejcikova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2021 Rome second round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2021* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-2 6-0 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2021* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 167 | 101 | 62.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Barbora Krejcikova | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #32 | 1,943 | 2 | 8 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |