H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Barbora Krejcikova vs Ysaline Bonaventure H2H: 1-0
Barbora Krejcikova holds a 1–0 lead over Ysaline Bonaventure in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbora Krejcikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2021 Prague fourth round 7-6(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 31
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2021* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Ysaline Bonaventure | Match data |
| Apr 23, 2016 | Prague | WTA 250 | Q1 | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 1-6 6-1 6-2 | Ysaline Bonaventure | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 167 | 101 | 62.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| Ysaline Bonaventure | #939 | #81 | 746 | 1,711 | 28 | 50 | 35.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Barbora Krejcikova | Ysaline Bonaventure | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #229 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #146 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #117 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #235 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 | 2022 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 | 2023 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #189 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #32 | 1,943 | 2 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |