H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Ajla Tomljanovic H2H: 1-0
Beatriz Haddad Maia holds a 1–0 lead over Ajla Tomljanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Beatriz Haddad Maia leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Beatriz Haddad Maia won the 2024 Seoul fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 30
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2024* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Beatriz Haddad Maia | 6-3 6-4 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | #153 | #10 | 3,194 | 1,944 | 147 | 135 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Ajla Tomljanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #246 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #71 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #15 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #58 | 1,769 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,537 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |