H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Christina Mchale H2H: 1-0
Beatriz Haddad Maia holds a 1–0 lead over Christina Mchale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Beatriz Haddad Maia leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Beatriz Haddad Maia won the 2017 Prague third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 30
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2017 | New Haven | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Christina Mchale | 6-2 6-2 | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Match data |
| May 3, 2017* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Beatriz Haddad Maia | 6-3 6-4 | Christina Mchale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | #153 | #10 | 3,194 | 1,944 | 147 | 135 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Christina Mchale | #319 | #24 | 1,935 | 1,803 | 166 | 207 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Christina Mchale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #231 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #246 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #43 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #33 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #71 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #66 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #52 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #15 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #151 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #58 | 1,769 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 2–16 | 11.1% | #159 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,537 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,452 | 0 | 1 |