H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Kaia Kanepi H2H: 1-1

Beatriz Haddad Maia and Kaia Kanepi are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kaia Kanepi leads 1–0 on clay, while Beatriz Haddad Maia leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Beatriz Haddad Maia won the 2022 Eastbourne Open round of 32 6-4 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Beatriz Haddad Maia
Brazil Age 30 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Kaia Kanepi
Estonia Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Beatriz Haddad Maia #29 6-4 3-6 6-3 Kaia Kanepi #39 Match data Jun 23, 2022* R32 Eastbourne Open WTA 500 Grass
Kaia Kanepi #46 6-4 6-4 Beatriz Haddad Maia #48 Match data May 26, 2022* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Beatriz Haddad Maia #154 #10 3,194 1,939 148 136 52.1% 0 0 1 1 2 4
Kaia Kanepi #1,322 #15 2,760 1,908 264 236 52.8% 0 0 0 2 2 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Kaia Kanepi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0
17 2013 1–1 50.0% #299 1,501 0 0 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0
18 2014 0–2 0.0% #239 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2015 3–2 60.0% #246 1,508 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #229 1,484 0 0
20 2016 0–3 0.0% #174 1,459 0 0 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,527 0 0
21 2017 14–12 53.8% #71 1,658 0 0 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,606 0 0
22 2018 5–9 35.7% #183 1,579 0 0 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,581 0 0
23 2019 7–5 58.3% #121 1,671 0 0 2008 30–21 58.8% #27 1,761 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,603 0 0
25 2021 2–2 50.0% #83 1,635 0 0 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,842 0 1
26 2022 34–21 61.8% #15 1,829 0 2 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,798 0 1
27 2023 32–21 60.4% #11 1,894 0 3 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,861 0 3
28 2024 34–25 57.6% #17 1,889 0 4 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,838 0 4
29 2025 16–22 42.1% #58 1,768 0 4 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,719 0 4
30 2026 0–11 0.0% #154 1,536 0 4 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,659 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,663 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,731 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2018 12–12 50.0% #61 1,776 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2019 9–9 50.0% #101 1,761 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,729 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,699 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,802 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2023 6–15 28.6% #168 1,627 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Kaia Kanepi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2015 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2017 8 6 14 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2006 8 8 16 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2018 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 4 6 10 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2019 3 3 6 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 19 12 31 61.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 9 13 22 40.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
26 2022 19 16 35 54.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 13 2 15 86.7% — — — — 2011 14 9 23 60.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 2023 18 14 32 56.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2012 13 6 19 68.4% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2024 24 16 40 60.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 2025 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2014 12 12 24 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2026 0 7 7 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 9 6 15 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 10 8 18 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 88 88 176 50.0% 34 32 66 51.5% 26 16 42 61.9% — — — — — 156 134 290 53.8% 88 76 164 53.7% 16 24 40 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 267/284 of Beatriz Haddad Maia's and 427/488 of Kaia Kanepi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Kaia Kanepi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2013 2/2 1.5 2.0 67.4% 65.8% 49.0% 81.8% 62.7% 60.5% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 2/2 1.0 2.5 67.9% 54.9% 17.6% 48.8% 31.3% 43.0% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2015 5/5 3.4 1.8 59.9% 67.9% 55.8% 51.8% 41.6% 62.9% 50.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2016 3/3 1.3 7.3 58.4% 58.0% 29.2% 44.6% 40.3% 45.7% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2017 26/26 1.6 3.6 68.1% 65.7% 47.9% 57.3% 43.6% 60.1% 42.2% 2006 5/30 3.2 3.6 50.1% 63.5% 51.7% 55.9% 43.1% 57.7% 43.7%
22 2018 14/14 1.7 4.2 65.1% 63.5% 40.5% 38.9% 52.0% 55.5% 40.0% 2007 21/30 3.0 7.0 57.0% 65.6% 38.7% 49.4% 52.0% 54.0% 42.6%
23 2019 12/12 2.1 4.9 72.9% 65.6% 47.3% 68.8% 38.1% 60.3% 42.3% 2008 37/51 2.4 5.1 58.3% 64.6% 45.9% 53.8% 50.1% 56.9% 45.8%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 35/36 3.1 5.3 52.3% 64.9% 42.8% 47.9% 52.3% 54.2% 43.8%
25 2021 4/4 1.5 2.5 62.1% 57.5% 39.1% 50.8% 48.2% 50.3% 44.4% 2010 42/46 3.7 5.1 59.4% 68.5% 44.9% 53.1% 44.3% 59.0% 47.2%
26 2022 51/55 2.9 4.1 64.9% 67.4% 46.8% 57.2% 43.8% 60.3% 41.5% 2011 35/36 4.4 4.3 57.1% 67.9% 44.3% 58.6% 44.1% 57.8% 44.4%
27 2023 52/53 2.2 2.9 69.4% 63.5% 49.6% 54.2% 45.7% 59.4% 42.7% 2012 34/34 4.0 4.7 57.0% 70.7% 48.0% 55.5% 51.0% 61.0% 47.8%
28 2024 57/59 2.2 3.4 64.0% 66.5% 47.2% 56.4% 50.9% 59.4% 43.3% 2013 30/31 4.1 4.5 55.7% 69.5% 47.3% 59.5% 45.7% 59.5% 43.9%
29 2025 28/38 2.2 5.0 64.6% 62.1% 43.4% 51.9% 39.3% 55.3% 41.1% 2014 36/36 4.1 5.5 55.7% 65.5% 43.2% 50.9% 45.3% 55.4% 43.2%
30 2026 11/11 0.9 5.5 63.2% 56.8% 30.5% 41.9% 35.3% 47.5% 38.7% 2015 18/20 3.5 4.7 55.8% 66.6% 45.7% 55.4% 59.7% 57.3% 41.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 1/1 1.0 4.0 65.3% 65.6% 11.8% 16.7% 100.0% 46.9% 38.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 6/6 2.0 2.7 71.5% 61.5% 44.5% 61.3% 43.3% 56.5% 42.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 22/24 2.6 4.5 59.6% 64.2% 47.7% 53.3% 45.4% 57.7% 44.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 18/18 3.5 4.7 58.4% 66.1% 42.5% 47.5% 39.9% 56.0% 44.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 3.6 3.2 58.7% 62.0% 47.8% 41.4% 49.8% 56.5% 45.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 22/23 3.7 4.6 51.7% 65.7% 46.8% 49.5% 54.1% 56.4% 41.5%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 39/40 4.6 3.7 55.9% 68.5% 49.0% 49.4% 45.1% 59.7% 43.1%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 21/21 2.5 3.1 57.0% 66.2% 46.9% 46.5% 42.8% 57.7% 40.7%
Career — 267/284 2.2 3.8 66.0% 64.7% 45.9% 54.6% 45.1% 58.2% 42.1% — 427/500 3.6 4.7 56.7% 66.8% 45.4% 52.4% 47.7% 57.5% 44.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Kaia Kanepi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1497 105.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.28
17 2013 1501 105.4 -1.64 -0.18 1.211 55.0% — — — 60.0% +1.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.23 2002 1498 103.4 — — — — — +23 — 40.0% -0.90 — — — +0.03
18 2014 1475 92.2 -4.60 -4.21 0.656 40.4% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2015 1509 112.3 +3.07 +1.80 1.352 55.7% — +60 — 66.7% +1.33 1–0 1–1 — +0.11 2004 1485 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.19
20 2016 1460 88.8 -3.89 -3.72 0.667 40.8% — — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.37 2005 1527 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 54.5% +0.18 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.08
21 2017 1658 123.3 +3.22 -1.30 1.058 51.2% -37 -29 -31 55.0% +0.32 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 95.7 -0.58 2006 1607 113.9 +0.07 -1.13 1.033 50.5% +4 -62 — 47.9% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.1 +0.19
22 2018 1579 120.0 -0.85 -2.40 0.899 47.7% +10 — — 41.4% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.9 -0.26 2007 1581 120.1 -1.50 -0.76 0.926 48.4% +17 +20 -16 46.5% -0.18 4–7 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 96.3 +0.10
23 2019 1672 123.2 +2.60 -1.74 1.063 51.7% -10 -26 — 58.6% +0.72 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 97.0 0.00 2008 1761 142.2 +1.74 +1.87 1.063 51.4% -2 -50 — 55.6% +0.40 13–9 (59%) 9–4 (69%) 107.7 +0.04
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1604 134.2 -0.69 +1.03 0.958 49.2% +69 +58 — 45.0% -0.20 4–8 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 89.0 +0.79
25 2021 1635 117.7 -2.24 +2.12 0.893 47.8% +29 — — 55.6% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.14 2010 1842 146.9 +2.60 +3.18 1.151 53.0% -58 -100 -165 63.4% +0.93 3–8 (27%) 9–3 (75%) 101.4 -1.00
26 2022 1830 142.7 +2.95 -0.63 1.044 50.8% -55 -59 +126 53.6% +0.22 16–7 (70%) 9–2 (82%) 112.2 +0.02 2011 1799 142.9 +1.95 +1.23 1.051 51.0% +49 -115 -218 50.6% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 3–6 (33%) 97.9 +0.49
27 2023 1895 151.9 +3.13 +0.69 1.052 50.8% -30 +20 +20 55.7% +0.41 16–8 (67%) 15–11 (58%) 107.1 -0.54 2012 1862 140.4 +3.77 +2.86 1.226 54.3% -34 -10 — 67.5% +1.30 7–2 (78%) 3–2 (60%) 104.5 +0.29
28 2024 1889 148.0 +2.61 +0.61 1.067 51.4% +4 -23 +13 57.3% +0.50 10–9 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 101.7 +1.85 2013 1838 132.3 +2.40 +0.55 1.085 51.8% -37 +75 -164 62.9% +0.74 6–2 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 106.6 +0.19
29 2025 1769 129.5 -1.12 -1.17 0.918 48.1% -33 +49 +112 44.6% -0.42 7–9 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 95.9 +1.80 2014 1719 134.8 +0.25 +0.12 0.969 49.5% +38 +81 -56 48.9% -0.16 7–9 (44%) 9–4 (69%) 97.8 -0.89
30 2026 1537 108.1 -5.46 -3.73 0.737 43.0% +43 +131 — 15.4% -2.46 0–4 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.5 +0.23 2015 1659 126.5 -0.20 +0.50 0.961 49.3% +51 +100 — 47.5% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.35
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1663 113.1 +1.02 -0.64 0.730 42.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.02
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1732 125.4 -0.85 +0.35 0.969 49.3% +33 — — 57.1% -0.14 2–0 — — +0.38
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1777 140.3 +1.23 +0.94 1.059 51.2% +67 -33 -156 54.7% +0.21 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 93.5 -0.34
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1762 130.8 -0.84 +2.11 1.014 50.2% +14 +32 — 48.9% 0.00 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 102.0 -0.46
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1729 113.7 +0.66 +1.49 1.042 51.0% +2 — — 41.7% +0.17 1–1 0–2 — -0.21
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1700 135.8 +0.07 -0.08 0.950 49.1% +53 +14 — 44.0% -0.34 4–2 (67%) 2–5 (29%) 99.7 -1.55
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1802 144.9 +2.41 +0.90 1.071 51.2% +48 +6 -236 54.7% +0.25 11–8 (58%) 6–7 (46%) 100.8 -0.84
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1627 124.3 +1.07 -1.99 0.962 49.0% +69 +54 — 38.0% -0.72 1–7 (13%) 2–8 (20%) 87.2 -0.08
Career — 1939 140.7 +1.71 -0.47 1.009 50.1% -20 +7 +75 51.2% +0.07 56–52 (52%) 47–38 (55%) 101.6 +1.22 — 1909 143.0 +1.22 +1.05 1.039 50.8% +24 +4 -153 52.4% +0.17 85–88 (49%) 63–63 (50%) 96.4 -0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.