H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Kamilla Rakhimova H2H: 0-1
Kamilla Rakhimova holds a 1–0 lead over Beatriz Haddad Maia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kamilla Rakhimova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kamilla Rakhimova won the 2022 Bogota fourth round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 30
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2022* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Kamilla Rakhimova | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Match data |
| Feb 18, 2022 | Doha | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Beatriz Haddad Maia | 6-1 6-3 | Kamilla Rakhimova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | #153 | #10 | 3,194 | 1,944 | 147 | 135 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Kamilla Rakhimova | #78 | #60 | 1,023 | 1,752 | 56 | 85 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Kamilla Rakhimova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #246 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #120 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #94 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #71 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #97 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #78 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #15 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #58 | 1,769 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,537 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |