H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Nao Hibino H2H: 0-1
Nao Hibino holds a 1–0 lead over Beatriz Haddad Maia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nao Hibino leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nao Hibino won the 2023 Jiangxi Open third round 7-6(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 30
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2023* | Jiangxi Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Nao Hibino | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | #153 | #10 | 3,194 | 1,944 | 147 | 135 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Nao Hibino | #235 | #56 | 1,050 | 1,726 | 79 | 118 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Nao Hibino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #246 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #66 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #71 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #15 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #129 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #58 | 1,769 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,537 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #174 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |