H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Samantha Stosur H2H: 1-0

Beatriz Haddad Maia holds a 1–0 lead over Samantha Stosur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Beatriz Haddad Maia leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Beatriz Haddad Maia won the 2017 Prague Open second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Beatriz Haddad Maia
Brazil Age 30 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Samantha Stosur
AUS Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Beatriz Haddad Maia #144 6-3 6-2 Samantha Stosur #19 Match data May 4, 2017* R16 Prague Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Beatriz Haddad Maia #154 #10 3,194 1,939 148 136 52.1% 0 0 1 1 2 4
Samantha Stosur #531 #4 6,195 2,072 459 345 57.1% 1 0 0 2 6 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Samantha Stosur
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2013 1–1 50.0% #299 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2014 0–2 0.0% #239 1,475 0 0 2002 0–2 0.0% #245 1,475 0 0
19 2015 3–2 60.0% #246 1,508 0 0 2003 2–4 33.3% #163 1,493 0 0
20 2016 0–3 0.0% #174 1,459 0 0 2004 17–17 50.0% #65 1,605 0 0
21 2017 14–12 53.8% #71 1,658 0 0 2005 18–22 45.0% #46 1,588 0 0
22 2018 5–9 35.7% #183 1,579 0 0 2006 29–24 54.7% #29 1,747 0 0
23 2019 7–5 58.3% #121 1,671 0 0 2007 15–15 50.0% #46 1,724 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2008 18–12 60.0% #52 1,754 0 0
25 2021 2–2 50.0% #83 1,635 0 0 2009 38–20 65.5% #13 1,887 0 1
26 2022 34–21 61.8% #15 1,829 0 2 2010 43–19 69.4% #6 1,931 0 2
27 2023 32–21 60.4% #11 1,894 0 3 2011 46–21 68.7% #6 1,967 1 3
28 2024 34–25 57.6% #17 1,889 0 4 2012 40–24 62.5% #9 1,873 1 3
29 2025 16–22 42.1% #58 1,768 0 4 2013 40–22 64.5% #18 1,904 1 5
30 2026 0–11 0.0% #154 1,536 0 4 2014 32–22 59.3% #22 1,860 1 6
31 — — — — — — — 2015 34–22 60.7% #27 1,782 1 8
32 — — — — — — — 2016 30–23 56.6% #21 1,702 1 8
33 — — — — — — — 2017 22–19 53.7% #41 1,731 1 9
34 — — — — — — — 2018 17–24 41.5% #74 1,655 1 9
35 — — — — — — — 2019 15–17 46.9% #99 1,631 1 9
36 — — — — — — — 2020 1–3 25.0% #112 1,607 1 9
37 — — — — — — — 2021 1–10 9.1% #382 1,518 1 9
38 — — — — — — — 2022 1–3 25.0% #529 1,506 1 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Samantha Stosur
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2015 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 12 11 23 52.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 2017 8 6 14 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2018 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 18 15 33 54.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 2019 3 3 6 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 6 7 13 46.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 11 7 18 61.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
25 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 29 14 43 67.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
26 2022 19 16 35 54.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 13 2 15 86.7% — — — — 2010 22 14 36 61.1% 18 3 21 85.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
27 2023 18 14 32 56.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 31 14 45 68.9% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2024 24 16 40 60.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2012 25 16 41 61.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
29 2025 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2013 31 15 46 67.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
30 2026 0 7 7 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 23 14 37 62.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 16 15 31 51.6% 16 5 21 76.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 11 15 26 42.3% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 10 13 23 43.5% 12 6 18 66.7% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 3 13 16 18.8% 9 7 16 56.3% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 9 11 20 45.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 88 88 176 50.0% 34 32 66 51.5% 26 16 42 61.9% — — — — — 274 224 498 55.0% 143 76 219 65.3% 36 41 77 46.8% 6 4 10 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 267/284 of Beatriz Haddad Maia's and 648/803 of Samantha Stosur's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Samantha Stosur
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2013 2/2 1.5 2.0 67.4% 65.8% 49.0% 81.8% 62.7% 60.5% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 2/2 1.0 2.5 67.9% 54.9% 17.6% 48.8% 31.3% 43.0% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2015 5/5 3.4 1.8 59.9% 67.9% 55.8% 51.8% 41.6% 62.9% 50.2% 2003 1/6 6.0 5.0 49.4% 74.4% 35.0% 33.3% 33.3% 54.4% 38.2%
20 2016 3/3 1.3 7.3 58.4% 58.0% 29.2% 44.6% 40.3% 45.7% 36.2% 2004 5/34 2.2 2.4 49.6% 64.1% 45.0% 55.6% 30.1% 54.4% 34.4%
21 2017 26/26 1.6 3.6 68.1% 65.7% 47.9% 57.3% 43.6% 60.1% 42.2% 2005 9/40 4.7 4.4 56.5% 70.7% 48.7% 49.9% 46.1% 61.2% 40.8%
22 2018 14/14 1.7 4.2 65.1% 63.5% 40.5% 38.9% 52.0% 55.5% 40.0% 2006 36/53 4.1 2.3 61.8% 64.6% 47.1% 51.1% 39.0% 58.2% 38.5%
23 2019 12/12 2.1 4.9 72.9% 65.6% 47.3% 68.8% 38.1% 60.3% 42.3% 2007 29/30 4.4 2.9 60.9% 66.0% 45.8% 59.0% 45.7% 57.6% 38.6%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 24/30 5.1 3.5 51.9% 71.1% 51.5% 59.2% 42.5% 61.4% 42.9%
25 2021 4/4 1.5 2.5 62.1% 57.5% 39.1% 50.8% 48.2% 50.3% 44.4% 2009 52/58 4.8 3.5 58.8% 68.8% 50.7% 61.2% 53.9% 61.1% 43.5%
26 2022 51/55 2.9 4.1 64.9% 67.4% 46.8% 57.2% 43.8% 60.3% 41.5% 2010 59/62 4.8 3.2 60.0% 70.7% 51.5% 57.8% 49.4% 63.0% 42.8%
27 2023 52/53 2.2 2.9 69.4% 63.5% 49.6% 54.2% 45.7% 59.4% 42.7% 2011 59/67 3.2 2.1 63.5% 71.2% 53.3% 62.1% 48.8% 64.6% 42.2%
28 2024 57/59 2.2 3.4 64.0% 66.5% 47.2% 56.4% 50.9% 59.4% 43.3% 2012 57/64 3.8 3.2 64.6% 68.1% 51.2% 59.1% 44.5% 62.1% 43.0%
29 2025 28/38 2.2 5.0 64.6% 62.1% 43.4% 51.9% 39.3% 55.3% 41.1% 2013 56/62 2.9 3.7 61.8% 68.1% 48.2% 61.2% 50.2% 60.3% 45.1%
30 2026 11/11 0.9 5.5 63.2% 56.8% 30.5% 41.9% 35.3% 47.5% 38.7% 2014 51/54 4.4 2.8 61.7% 69.1% 51.1% 55.0% 50.9% 62.3% 42.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 43/56 4.7 3.4 60.4% 69.7% 59.1% 58.6% 45.0% 65.5% 41.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 40/53 3.5 4.8 60.5% 64.9% 45.1% 52.4% 46.1% 57.1% 40.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 39/41 3.8 2.9 62.6% 67.3% 48.7% 54.2% 47.9% 60.4% 44.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 40/42 4.1 3.3 60.6% 65.0% 47.7% 50.5% 45.7% 58.2% 37.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 30/32 4.2 4.5 58.8% 65.9% 40.1% 52.8% 41.5% 55.3% 40.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 4/4 2.3 3.8 69.9% 61.3% 34.5% 40.5% 31.5% 53.8% 36.7%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 10/11 2.8 3.7 64.7% 59.4% 36.6% 53.1% 31.7% 51.3% 32.8%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 4/4 3.8 4.3 59.3% 59.0% 38.3% 25.7% 34.2% 51.4% 38.4%
Career — 267/284 2.2 3.8 66.0% 64.7% 45.9% 54.6% 45.1% 58.2% 42.1% — 648/805 4.0 3.3 60.9% 67.9% 49.4% 56.7% 46.6% 60.6% 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Beatriz Haddad Maia Samantha Stosur
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2013 1501 105.4 -1.64 -0.18 1.211 55.0% — — — 60.0% +1.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 1475 92.2 -4.60 -4.21 0.656 40.4% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.07 2002 1476 94.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.20 0–1 — — +0.06
19 2015 1509 112.3 +3.07 +1.80 1.352 55.7% — +60 — 66.7% +1.33 1–0 1–1 — +0.11 2003 1493 117.7 +0.87 +0.74 0.837 46.5% +24 — — 35.7% 0.00 1–1 0–5 (0%) — -0.19
20 2016 1460 88.8 -3.89 -3.72 0.667 40.8% — — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.37 2004 1606 118.2 -0.27 -2.88 0.756 44.8% +5 -91 -21 51.3% -0.46 3–5 (38%) 7–2 (78%) 102.6 -1.27
21 2017 1658 123.3 +3.22 -1.30 1.058 51.2% -37 -29 -31 55.0% +0.32 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 95.7 -0.58 2005 1589 131.3 +2.67 -1.67 1.051 50.5% +30 -61 -33 44.9% -0.27 5–8 (38%) 6–10 (38%) 95.4 -0.78
22 2018 1579 120.0 -0.85 -2.40 0.899 47.7% +10 — — 41.4% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.9 -0.26 2006 1748 143.1 +1.45 -3.76 0.920 48.0% +2 -155 -135 52.2% +0.09 7–6 (54%) 3–8 (27%) 98.8 -0.70
23 2019 1672 123.2 +2.60 -1.74 1.063 51.7% -10 -26 — 58.6% +0.72 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 97.0 0.00 2007 1724 135.6 +1.83 -2.92 0.911 48.6% -2 -43 -124 50.7% +0.19 5–4 (56%) 2–6 (25%) 98.6 -2.25
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1755 134.8 +4.41 +0.22 1.111 52.1% -11 -77 -81 58.1% +0.69 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 96.0 -0.47
25 2021 1635 117.7 -2.24 +2.12 0.893 47.8% +29 — — 55.6% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.14 2009 1888 154.7 +5.39 +0.57 1.119 52.5% -7 -129 -180 63.0% +0.94 10–11 (48%) 10–5 (67%) 104.0 -1.65
26 2022 1830 142.7 +2.95 -0.63 1.044 50.8% -55 -59 +126 53.6% +0.22 16–7 (70%) 9–2 (82%) 112.2 +0.02 2010 1932 159.5 +7.09 +0.23 1.156 52.9% -40 +78 -207 63.9% +1.12 14–6 (70%) 10–9 (53%) 107.5 -1.75
27 2023 1895 151.9 +3.13 +0.69 1.052 50.8% -30 +20 +20 55.7% +0.41 16–8 (67%) 15–11 (58%) 107.1 -0.54 2011 1968 158.2 +8.42 -0.10 1.193 53.4% -20 +28 -223 64.2% +1.11 12–7 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 102.1 -0.95
28 2024 1889 148.0 +2.61 +0.61 1.067 51.4% +4 -23 +13 57.3% +0.50 10–9 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 101.7 +1.85 2012 1873 150.5 +5.95 +0.23 1.134 52.5% +7 +160 -197 58.8% +0.71 13–11 (54%) 8–14 (36%) 93.9 +1.71
29 2025 1768 129.5 -1.12 -1.17 0.918 48.1% -32 +50 +113 44.6% -0.42 7–9 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 95.9 +1.81 2013 1904 152.1 +4.49 +1.51 1.138 52.7% +14 +46 -214 63.6% +1.01 11–9 (55%) 6–4 (60%) 99.3 +1.39
30 2026 1536 108.1 -5.44 -3.77 0.737 43.0% +44 +132 — 15.4% -2.46 0–4 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.5 +0.23 2014 1860 149.0 +5.95 +0.29 1.140 52.5% +6 +80 -205 59.0% +0.65 6–12 (33%) 7–6 (54%) 90.0 -1.01
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1783 141.4 +5.95 +0.02 1.201 53.3% -26 +170 -121 55.7% +0.79 10–6 (63%) 3–8 (27%) 96.9 -0.45
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1702 133.6 +1.07 -2.01 0.933 48.8% -49 +307 -57 50.9% -0.12 12–4 (75%) 7–8 (47%) 102.9 -0.09
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1732 137.4 +3.91 +0.24 1.115 52.4% -86 +251 — 55.6% +0.41 6–11 (35%) 6–0 (100%) 99.3 +0.51
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1655 126.0 +1.35 -4.20 0.900 48.1% -67 +228 +30 40.0% -0.64 3–4 (43%) 2–7 (22%) 93.2 -0.94
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1631 116.9 -0.46 -2.06 0.900 47.9% -38 +150 +51 46.7% -0.59 6–5 (55%) 6–0 (100%) 106.9 +0.48
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1607 111.3 -1.57 -0.87 0.795 45.4% -26 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 2–0 — -0.08
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1518 99.9 -2.40 -3.51 0.673 42.9% -10 — +80 20.0% -2.40 0–3 (0%) — — +0.44
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1506 100.9 -2.15 -2.55 0.791 45.1% +8 — — 22.2% -1.55 1–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.30
Career — 1939 140.7 +1.71 -0.47 1.009 50.1% -20 +8 +75 51.2% +0.07 56–52 (52%) 47–38 (55%) 101.6 +1.22 — 2072 148.5 +4.28 -0.68 1.059 51.2% -13 +101 -98 55.2% +0.39 127–118 (52%) 95–103 (48%) 95.8 -0.97

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.