H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:17 UTC
Beatriz Haddad Maia vs Viktorija Golubic H2H: 2-0
Beatriz Haddad Maia holds a 2–0 lead over Viktorija Golubic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Beatriz Haddad Maia leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Beatriz Haddad Maia won the 2025 US Open second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 30
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 33
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2025 | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Beatriz Haddad Maia | 6-1 6-4 | Viktorija Golubic | Match data |
| Aug 21, 2024* | Cleveland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Beatriz Haddad Maia | 6-3 7-5 | Viktorija Golubic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | #153 | #10 | 3,194 | 1,944 | 147 | 135 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Viktorija Golubic | #47 | #35 | 1,531 | 1,831 | 123 | 141 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Viktorija Golubic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #246 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #71 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #56 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #104 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #15 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #58 | 1,769 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #76 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,537 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #83 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |