H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Belinda Bencic vs Ajla Tomljanovic H2H: 1-1
Belinda Bencic and Ajla Tomljanovic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ajla Tomljanovic leads 1–0 on clay, while Belinda Bencic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Belinda Bencic won the 2015 Wuhan second round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2015* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 7-5 7-5 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
| May 6, 2015* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Ajla Tomljanovic | 6-4 6-3 | Belinda Bencic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belinda Bencic | #14 | #4 | 4,745 | 2,032 | 298 | 187 | 61.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Belinda Bencic | Ajla Tomljanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #612 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2014 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #32 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,886 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #43 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #98 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #8 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #12 | 1,850 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 9 | 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,998 | 0 | 9 | 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |