H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Belinda Bencic vs Beatriz Haddad Maia H2H: 3-1
Belinda Bencic holds a 3–1 lead over Beatriz Haddad Maia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Belinda Bencic leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Belinda Bencic won the 2025 Madrid third round 6-3 4-6 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 30
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2025 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Belinda Bencic | 6-3 4-6 7-6(2) | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2023* | Abu Dhabi | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 6-2 6-3 | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2022* | Toronto | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Beatriz Haddad Maia | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | Belinda Bencic | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2022* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 6-3 6-2 | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belinda Bencic | #14 | #4 | 4,745 | 2,032 | 298 | 187 | 61.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | #153 | #10 | 3,194 | 1,944 | 147 | 135 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Belinda Bencic | Beatriz Haddad Maia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #612 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #32 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,886 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #43 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #246 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #98 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #71 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #8 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #12 | 1,850 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | 2022 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #15 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2025 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 9 | 2024 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2026 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,998 | 0 | 9 | 2025 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #58 | 1,769 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,537 | 0 | 4 |