H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Belinda Bencic vs Daria Saville H2H: 2-2
Belinda Bencic and Daria Saville are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Belinda Bencic leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Daria Saville leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Belinda Bencic won the 2022 Miami quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 32
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2022* | Miami | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 6-1 6-2 | Daria Saville | Match data |
| May 13, 2015* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Daria Saville | 6-7(2) 7-5 6-2 | Belinda Bencic | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2015* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Daria Saville | 6-3 6-0 | Belinda Bencic | Match data |
| Sep 25, 2013* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 6-2 5-7 7-5 | Daria Saville | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belinda Bencic | #14 | #4 | 4,745 | 2,032 | 298 | 187 | 61.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Daria Saville | #226 | #20 | 2,135 | 1,836 | 156 | 153 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Belinda Bencic | Daria Saville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #612 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #539 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2014 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #32 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,886 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #43 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #98 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #8 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #25 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #12 | 1,850 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #35 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2022 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2023 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #450 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #419 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2025 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 9 | 2022 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #53 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2026 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,998 | 0 | 9 | 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #204 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #108 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |