H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Belinda Bencic vs Irina-Camelia Begu H2H: 1-1
Belinda Bencic and Irina-Camelia Begu are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Belinda Bencic leads 1–0 on clay, while Irina-Camelia Begu leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Belinda Bencic won the 2022 Madrid second round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2022* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Belinda Bencic | 6-4 6-1 | Irina-Camelia Begu | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2016* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Irina-Camelia Begu | 6-4 4-3 (ret.) | Belinda Bencic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belinda Bencic | #14 | #4 | 4,745 | 2,032 | 298 | 187 | 61.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Irina-Camelia Begu | #204 | #22 | 1,925 | 1,886 | 249 | 234 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Belinda Bencic | Irina-Camelia Begu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #612 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2014 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #32 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,886 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #43 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #98 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #40 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #52 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2019 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #8 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #12 | 1,850 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #41 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2022 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #29 | 1,711 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2023 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #43 | 1,667 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,601 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2025 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 9 | 2019 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #102 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2026 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,998 | 0 | 9 | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,710 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #34 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #75 | 1,781 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,807 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #144 | 1,760 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,726 | 0 | 6 |