H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Belinda Bencic vs Karolina Pliskova H2H: 1-1
Belinda Bencic and Karolina Pliskova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Karolina Pliskova won the 2022 US Open third round 5-7 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 34
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2022* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Karolina Pliskova | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | Belinda Bencic | Match data |
| Mar 15, 2019* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Karolina Pliskova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belinda Bencic | #14 | #4 | 4,745 | 2,032 | 298 | 187 | 61.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Karolina Pliskova | #64 | #1 | 6,940 | 2,041 | 421 | 241 | 63.6% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Belinda Bencic | Karolina Pliskova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #612 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #736 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #465 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2014 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #32 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,886 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #43 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #98 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #118 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #71 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2019 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #8 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #12 | 1,850 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,813 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2021 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,901 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2022 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #4 | 1,930 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2023 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,916 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #2 | 1,975 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 2025 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 9 | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #6 | 1,914 | 0 | 16 |
| 29 | 2026 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,998 | 0 | 9 | 2021 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #4 | 1,972 | 0 | 16 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,834 | 0 | 16 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #38 | 1,759 | 0 | 16 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #41 | 1,777 | 0 | 17 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #64 | 1,879 | 0 | 17 |