H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Belinda Bencic vs Naomi Osaka H2H: 4-1
Belinda Bencic holds a 4–1 lead over Naomi Osaka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Belinda Bencic leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Belinda Bencic won the 2025 Australian Open third round 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2025 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 7-6(3) | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
| Apr 2, 2022* | Miami | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Belinda Bencic | Match data |
| Sep 3, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 7-5 6-4 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
| May 10, 2019* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Belinda Bencic | 3-6 6-2 7-5 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2019* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 6-3 6-1 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belinda Bencic | #14 | #4 | 4,745 | 2,032 | 298 | 187 | 61.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Belinda Bencic | Naomi Osaka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #612 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2014 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #32 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,886 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #43 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #98 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 |
| 21 | 2018 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 |
| 22 | 2019 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #8 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 |
| 23 | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #12 | 1,850 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 |
| 24 | 2021 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 |
| 25 | 2022 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 |
| 28 | 2025 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 9 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 |
| 29 | 2026 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,998 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |