H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bernarda Pera vs Anett Kontaveit H2H: 2-1
Bernarda Pera holds a 2–1 lead over Anett Kontaveit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Bernarda Pera leads 2–0 on clay, while Anett Kontaveit leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bernarda Pera won the 2023 Roland Garros first round 7-6(6) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
EST
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2023* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Bernarda Pera | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Anett Kontaveit | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2022* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Bernarda Pera | 6-2 6-4 | Anett Kontaveit | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2022* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Anett Kontaveit | 7-5 6-1 | Bernarda Pera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernarda Pera | #314 | #27 | 1,519 | 1,836 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,109 | 205 | 138 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bernarda Pera | Anett Kontaveit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,832 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2018 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #23 | 1,912 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #62 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2021 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2022 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #44 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2023 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #71 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |