H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 16:32 UTC
Bernarda Pera vs Polona Hercog
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Bernarda Pera vs Polona Hercog.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 35
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bernarda Pera | #314 | #27 | 1,519 | 1,836 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Polona Hercog | #219 | #35 | 1,605 | 1,768 | 170 | 212 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bernarda Pera | Polona Hercog | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #375 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #47 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #36 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #76 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,701 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2018 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2019 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #73 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2020 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #62 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2021 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,584 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2022 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #44 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #85 | 1,626 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2023 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2024 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #71 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #49 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2025 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #134 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,565 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,628 | 0 | 3 |