H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Bernarda Pera vs Polona Hercog

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Bernarda Pera vs Polona Hercog.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bernarda Pera
United States Age 31 Left-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Polona Hercog
Slovenia Age 35 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bernarda Pera #70 6-4 5-7 6-4 Polona Hercog #73 Match data Apr 28, 2021 Q2 Q Madrid Open WTA 1000 Clay
Bernarda Pera #98 6-2 6-0 Polona Hercog #62 Match data May 4, 2018 Q1 Q Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bernarda Pera #314 #27 1,519 1,836 96 126 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Polona Hercog #236 #35 1,605 1,767 170 214 44.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bernarda Pera Polona Hercog
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #375 1,488 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2008 0–2 0.0% #245 1,470 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2009 6–8 42.9% #68 1,501 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2010 26–24 52.0% #47 1,633 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2011 27–25 51.9% #36 1,698 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2012 14–21 40.0% #76 1,665 0 2
22 2017 0–1 0.0% #127 1,514 0 0 2013 10–10 50.0% #65 1,673 0 2
23 2018 13–13 50.0% #69 1,637 0 0 2014 12–16 42.9% #97 1,638 0 2
24 2019 15–16 48.4% #66 1,689 0 0 2015 19–23 45.2% #73 1,606 0 2
25 2020 5–10 33.3% #62 1,668 0 0 2016 10–18 35.7% #143 1,558 0 2
26 2021 10–21 32.3% #93 1,628 0 0 2017 2–2 50.0% #101 1,571 0 2
27 2022 15–10 60.0% #44 1,754 0 2 2018 15–19 44.1% #85 1,623 0 2
28 2023 19–21 47.5% #65 1,687 0 2 2019 19–21 47.5% #49 1,715 0 3
29 2024 12–19 38.7% #71 1,763 0 2 2020 6–8 42.9% #49 1,684 0 3
30 2025 7–15 31.8% #157 1,655 0 2 2021 4–15 21.1% #134 1,589 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #236 1,586 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bernarda Pera Polona Hercog
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 4 5 20.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 13 13 26 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 10 14 24 41.7% 16 9 25 64.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 12 16 25.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2018 7 8 15 46.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 3 8 11 27.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2019 5 10 15 33.3% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2015 10 15 25 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2020 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 1 8 9 11.1% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 2021 6 11 17 35.3% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 2022 4 7 11 36.4% 11 2 13 84.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 4 9 13 30.8% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 2023 8 11 19 42.1% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2019 6 14 20 30.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
29 2024 7 13 20 35.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2020 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — —
30 2025 3 9 12 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 44 77 121 36.4% 47 36 83 56.6% 5 13 18 27.8% — — — — — 62 117 179 34.6% 97 75 172 56.4% 11 21 32 34.4% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 213/222 of Bernarda Pera's and 352/384 of Polona Hercog's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bernarda Pera Polona Hercog
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 6.0 5.0 69.5% 58.5% 36.1% 41.7% 80.0% 51.7% 39.4%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/2 0.0 5.0 84.0% 47.1% 23.1% 41.7% 62.5% 43.2% 45.7%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 13/14 2.1 2.8 61.8% 62.6% 45.1% 51.3% 42.4% 55.6% 39.8%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 46/50 2.2 2.7 62.0% 64.2% 48.6% 54.1% 48.1% 58.3% 42.8%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 46/52 2.6 2.7 65.1% 62.0% 48.8% 53.0% 47.3% 57.5% 41.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 33/35 2.2 2.4 60.0% 62.3% 44.3% 46.0% 48.7% 54.8% 40.5%
22 2017 1/1 3.0 9.0 55.7% 53.7% 32.6% 30.8% 40.0% 44.3% 50.0% 2013 14/20 2.7 2.5 66.6% 64.4% 51.1% 53.5% 45.6% 60.1% 42.5%
23 2018 25/26 3.2 5.0 60.4% 64.4% 47.6% 55.8% 46.9% 57.8% 42.1% 2014 24/28 3.0 2.8 57.1% 63.5% 46.2% 54.4% 38.9% 55.9% 39.8%
24 2019 30/31 3.0 4.0 61.8% 66.4% 48.8% 58.7% 51.6% 59.7% 42.8% 2015 37/42 2.8 3.1 63.8% 65.6% 52.4% 50.3% 53.0% 60.8% 40.6%
25 2020 15/15 3.5 6.7 58.9% 65.8% 38.0% 52.4% 46.1% 54.5% 41.2% 2016 26/28 2.0 3.4 58.7% 59.2% 43.1% 50.2% 52.7% 52.7% 43.8%
26 2021 31/31 2.6 5.6 60.3% 61.5% 44.2% 55.3% 47.7% 54.7% 44.1% 2017 4/4 3.8 3.8 60.4% 66.7% 48.5% 45.5% 48.2% 59.6% 45.1%
27 2022 25/25 2.5 3.8 62.7% 66.9% 46.2% 53.1% 49.5% 59.5% 45.1% 2018 34/34 3.2 3.9 55.6% 63.3% 48.9% 62.2% 37.8% 56.8% 41.5%
28 2023 40/40 3.7 5.6 62.4% 61.8% 45.2% 54.8% 49.4% 55.6% 41.5% 2019 39/40 3.5 4.3 55.9% 67.1% 48.4% 54.9% 46.8% 58.6% 40.7%
29 2024 31/31 4.0 5.2 60.2% 63.7% 42.2% 59.0% 46.1% 55.4% 41.1% 2020 14/14 2.1 3.4 56.8% 63.2% 46.7% 52.4% 53.1% 55.6% 44.0%
30 2025 15/22 4.9 4.7 61.4% 64.2% 44.7% 58.0% 41.9% 56.5% 37.8% 2021 19/19 3.4 3.6 55.4% 63.7% 43.6% 44.1% 34.2% 55.0% 39.2%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 1/1 0.0 1.0 37.5% 100.0% 40.0% — — 62.5% 14.3%
Career — 213/222 3.4 5.1 61.1% 64.0% 44.9% 55.9% 47.9% 56.7% 42.3% — 352/384 2.7 3.2 60.1% 63.7% 47.5% 52.3% 46.3% 57.1% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bernarda Pera Polona Hercog
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1489 100.3 -2.72 -1.27 0.816 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1470 102.5 -2.06 -1.94 0.805 44.4% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — -0.18
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1501 106.8 +0.29 -3.10 0.898 48.1% -40 +89 — 40.6% -0.53 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 102.8 +0.08
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1634 130.1 +2.35 -0.89 1.024 50.4% -68 +49 — 50.0% +0.14 4–8 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 -0.18
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1699 128.3 +1.64 -2.16 0.985 49.5% -94 +106 -139 51.3% +0.03 9–6 (60%) 5–8 (38%) 100.2 -0.20
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1666 121.2 -0.89 -2.18 0.897 47.5% -100 +153 — 40.3% -0.94 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) 101.7 -1.34
22 2017 1515 107.6 +2.02 -2.32 0.898 47.1% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.08 2013 1674 131.4 +2.50 +0.02 1.065 51.3% -74 +126 — 52.2% +0.52 2–6 (25%) 1–6 (14%) 91.8 -0.86
23 2018 1638 128.8 +0.83 +0.08 0.998 50.0% -32 +7 — 50.8% -0.16 4–5 (44%) 4–3 (57%) 101.0 +0.74 2014 1639 121.6 -0.49 -2.45 0.903 48.0% -47 +97 -116 43.5% -0.42 5–3 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 100.2 -1.81
24 2019 1689 125.8 +2.00 +0.03 1.060 51.5% -57 +19 -78 49.3% +0.49 6–7 (46%) 1–9 (10%) 94.5 +0.54 2015 1606 121.6 +1.66 -0.91 1.034 50.7% -33 +93 -84 49.5% -0.03 5–14 (26%) 4–5 (44%) 91.7 +0.24
25 2020 1668 133.5 -1.33 -0.42 0.907 48.0% -7 +1 — 41.7% -0.67 1–5 (17%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 -1.35 2016 1559 116.5 -2.35 +0.40 0.926 48.3% -25 +109 -113 42.4% -0.37 2–5 (29%) 4–1 (80%) 98.5 -1.05
26 2021 1628 127.6 -0.76 +0.63 0.974 49.5% -20 +57 — 40.8% -0.40 3–11 (21%) 2–4 (33%) 91.2 -0.35 2017 1571 105.5 +0.03 -1.29 1.118 51.8% — — -87 50.0% +0.60 1–1 0–2 — +0.25
27 2022 1755 137.7 +1.79 +1.65 1.114 52.2% -115 +194 — 61.1% +0.89 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -1.74 2018 1624 119.4 -0.20 -1.09 0.959 49.0% -61 +57 -123 45.8% -0.32 3–5 (38%) 3–4 (43%) 97.3 -0.53
28 2023 1688 128.1 -0.35 -1.25 0.936 48.8% -60 +196 -214 46.3% -0.42 9–6 (60%) 8–6 (57%) 103.1 +0.43 2019 1715 133.2 +1.87 -1.25 0.983 49.7% -111 +63 -107 47.9% -0.16 8–10 (44%) 6–10 (38%) 98.0 -0.38
29 2024 1764 134.0 -0.69 -1.42 0.922 48.2% -26 +78 -94 42.5% -0.66 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -0.98 2020 1685 125.8 +0.14 +0.43 0.991 50.0% -59 +53 — 48.5% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.33
30 2025 1655 126.5 -0.58 -3.69 0.870 47.7% +15 +76 -55 36.0% -0.64 2–4 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 93.8 -0.84 2021 1590 121.5 -0.67 -1.96 0.871 46.9% -38 +130 — 30.4% -1.39 2–6 (25%) 0–4 (0%) 92.6 -1.36
31 2026 1639 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1573 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1581 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1577 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1620 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1586 99.1 -0.36 -0.84 0.381 40.0% — — — — — — — — -0.19
Career — 1837 134.7 +0.19 -0.44 0.975 49.6% -37 +96 -117 46.1% -0.20 32–49 (40%) 24–36 (40%) 89.0 -1.64 — 1767 129.3 +0.66 -1.31 0.965 49.2% -68 +90 -110 46.2% -0.23 49–74 (40%) 32–56 (36%) 87.4 -1.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.