H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs Alizé Cornet H2H: 1-2

Alizé Cornet holds a 2–1 lead over Bethanie Mattek-Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alizé Cornet leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Alizé Cornet won the 2018 Miami Open first round 6-2 7-5.

United States Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 2
3 main-draw meetings
France Age 36 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alizé Cornet #38 6-2 7-5 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #143 Match data Mar 22, 2018* R128 Miami Open Premier Mandatory modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #90 6-3 6-3 Alizé Cornet #44 Match data Oct 5, 2015 R64 China Open Premier Mandatory modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Alizé Cornet #17 7-6(5) 6-1 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #44 Match data Aug 28, 2008* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #1,356 #30 1,643 1,779 132 171 43.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Alizé Cornet #460 #11 3,256 1,884 379 361 51.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Alizé Cornet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2005 1–1 50.0% #317 1,515 0 0
16 2001 0–2 0.0% #343 1,471 0 0 2006 1–2 33.3% #196 1,509 0 0
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,470 0 0 2007 8–9 47.1% #55 1,570 0 0
18 2003 0–5 0.0% #158 1,428 0 0 2008 36–22 62.1% #16 1,781 0 1
19 2004 2–3 40.0% #172 1,445 0 0 2009 20–24 45.5% #49 1,662 0 1
20 2005 3–3 50.0% #123 1,488 0 0 2010 17–20 45.9% #78 1,610 0 1
21 2006 9–12 42.9% #126 1,571 0 0 2011 10–17 37.0% #88 1,561 0 1
22 2007 6–8 42.9% #114 1,590 0 0 2012 22–20 52.4% #44 1,640 0 2
23 2008 19–14 57.6% #39 1,700 0 0 2013 35–27 56.5% #27 1,730 0 3
24 2009 7–14 33.3% #153 1,624 0 0 2014 37–24 60.7% #19 1,791 0 4
25 2010 14–13 51.9% #58 1,706 0 0 2015 23–26 46.9% #43 1,631 0 4
26 2011 18–14 56.2% #55 1,709 0 0 2016 22–21 51.2% #41 1,704 0 5
27 2012 5–9 35.7% #169 1,667 0 0 2017 24–22 52.2% #38 1,754 0 5
28 2013 16–15 51.6% #48 1,691 0 0 2018 23–24 48.9% #45 1,689 0 6
29 2014 3–9 25.0% #177 1,611 0 0 2019 24–20 54.5% #59 1,698 0 6
30 2015 14–14 50.0% #60 1,680 0 0 2020 13–9 59.1% #53 1,771 0 6
31 2016 5–15 25.0% #178 1,579 0 0 2021 24–24 50.0% #61 1,744 0 6
32 2017 7–7 50.0% #123 1,672 0 0 2022 26–23 53.1% #36 1,752 0 6
33 2018 1–6 14.3% #350 1,607 0 0 2023 12–18 40.0% #117 1,671 0 6
34 2019 1–3 25.0% #370 1,588 0 0 2024 1–7 12.5% #391 1,607 0 6
35 2020 0–1 0.0% #338 1,609 0 0 2025 0–1 0.0% #460 1,554 0 6
36 2021 2–2 50.0% #368 1,599 0 0
38 2023 0–1 0.0% #1360 1,546 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Alizé Cornet
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2005 1 1 2 50.0%
16 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 12 11 23 52.2% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 2009 12 13 25 48.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 2005 3 3 6 50.0% 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2006 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 7 8 15 46.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2007 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2008 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 2013 17 15 32 53.1% 15 9 24 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2009 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2014 28 16 44 63.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
25 2010 9 7 16 56.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 16 18 34 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2012 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2017 20 14 34 58.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2013 8 10 18 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 12 16 28 42.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2014 3 9 12 25.0% 2019 13 11 24 54.2% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 2015 8 7 15 53.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2020 11 7 18 61.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 2016 3 10 13 23.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2021 16 15 31 51.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5%
32 2017 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2022 16 16 32 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
33 2018 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2023 2 8 10 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
34 2019 1 3 4 25.0% 2024 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
35 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 2025 0 1 1 0.0%
36 2021 2 2 4 50.0%
38 2023 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 77 105 182 42.3% 38 48 86 44.2% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 217 208 425 51.1% 122 107 229 53.3% 33 38 71 46.5% 7 8 15 46.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 249/290 of Bethanie Mattek-Sands's and 665/741 of Alizé Cornet's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Alizé Cornet
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 —/— 2005 2/2 1.5 1.5 58.6% 56.3% 41.2% 45.0% 34.8% 49.8% 41.9%
16 —/— 2006 3/3 1.3 6.7 58.0% 57.6% 45.5% 62.1% 51.4% 52.7% 42.3%
17 —/— 2007 8/17 1.4 4.8 57.0% 61.7% 36.5% 46.8% 39.4% 50.8% 47.0%
18 2003 1/5 1.0 3.0 54.7% 56.1% 35.3% 20.0% 61.5% 46.7% 49.4% 2008 48/58 2.4 3.1 59.4% 64.4% 43.4% 55.4% 56.2% 55.9% 47.1%
19 —/— 2009 43/44 1.9 4.9 55.0% 59.8% 44.5% 47.9% 44.7% 52.9% 45.0%
20 —/— 2010 32/37 2.3 3.6 60.6% 63.2% 40.3% 52.0% 47.3% 54.3% 45.9%
21 2006 13/21 3.3 2.6 58.5% 64.2% 43.2% 51.7% 42.0% 55.3% 42.2% 2011 26/27 2.2 5.1 59.0% 59.3% 40.6% 51.5% 55.2% 51.6% 45.2%
22 2007 13/14 2.2 1.5 57.7% 66.3% 49.3% 46.9% 43.7% 58.9% 41.2% 2012 36/42 1.2 4.7 61.0% 60.7% 40.8% 49.1% 53.9% 52.8% 48.2%
23 2008 23/33 1.6 3.7 64.3% 62.9% 46.1% 64.0% 47.4% 56.9% 45.5% 2013 51/62 2.1 4.7 60.5% 61.5% 44.5% 54.0% 52.2% 54.8% 47.0%
24 2009 20/21 1.7 2.4 63.3% 57.7% 45.5% 46.1% 46.9% 52.9% 41.6% 2014 52/61 1.5 5.0 62.9% 63.4% 45.2% 49.6% 51.5% 56.5% 47.0%
25 2010 26/27 2.2 2.0 61.3% 64.4% 51.1% 59.0% 47.7% 59.3% 45.0% 2015 42/49 1.8 5.9 65.7% 62.3% 48.9% 48.9% 51.7% 57.7% 44.1%
26 2011 30/32 1.8 2.9 58.9% 62.7% 47.4% 46.8% 49.5% 56.3% 46.5% 2016 35/43 1.5 5.5 63.1% 62.7% 41.0% 58.8% 51.0% 54.5% 44.7%
27 2012 13/14 3.1 2.8 51.1% 68.5% 44.4% 54.8% 52.0% 56.7% 40.9% 2017 41/46 1.0 4.3 64.3% 59.3% 41.1% 52.6% 51.7% 52.9% 47.4%
28 2013 27/31 2.4 3.0 54.9% 68.8% 47.6% 53.9% 48.4% 58.9% 43.9% 2018 45/47 1.2 3.6 65.2% 60.9% 45.3% 52.0% 50.6% 55.5% 44.7%
29 2014 12/12 2.4 3.1 58.1% 60.2% 43.1% 50.7% 45.1% 53.1% 43.9% 2019 44/44 1.5 3.2 63.1% 63.5% 46.3% 51.5% 50.0% 57.1% 47.8%
30 2015 21/28 1.7 3.3 61.5% 63.6% 51.1% 55.5% 52.4% 58.9% 41.4% 2020 22/22 2.2 4.7 62.6% 66.3% 42.6% 56.0% 51.4% 57.5% 44.4%
31 2016 20/21 2.2 4.2 56.6% 62.3% 45.1% 47.9% 43.6% 54.9% 41.5% 2021 47/49 1.6 4.5 63.0% 62.7% 42.0% 52.0% 51.8% 54.8% 45.9%
32 2017 13/14 1.8 2.9 55.0% 61.5% 45.4% 57.9% 49.2% 53.6% 45.2% 2022 49/49 2.2 4.6 58.7% 65.5% 45.2% 51.7% 48.8% 57.2% 44.0%
33 2018 7/7 1.9 3.1 55.8% 61.6% 47.2% 57.8% 36.8% 54.9% 36.7% 2023 30/30 1.5 5.3 63.6% 61.9% 42.7% 52.0% 54.8% 54.8% 43.2%
34 2019 4/4 1.0 1.0 59.9% 59.5% 37.2% 43.1% 30.6% 50.5% 37.4% 2024 8/8 1.4 5.6 58.6% 57.6% 36.6% 52.0% 36.2% 48.6% 39.2%
35 2020 1/1 0.0 2.0 68.9% 52.4% 42.1% 50.0% 50.0% 49.2% 38.2% 2025 1/1 0.0 5.0 50.9% 51.9% 23.1% 0.0% 16.7% 37.7% 38.3%
36 2021 4/4 4.8 2.0 63.2% 64.2% 49.7% 62.7% 52.8% 58.9% 38.5% —/—
38 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 58.7% 40.7% 21.1% 22.2% 75.0% 32.6% 46.3% —/—
Career 249/304 2.1 2.8 58.9% 63.4% 46.8% 53.0% 47.3% 56.3% 43.2% 665/741 1.7 4.5 61.6% 62.2% 43.5% 51.9% 50.9% 55.0% 45.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bethanie Mattek-Sands Alizé Cornet
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2005 1516 106.6 -1.79 +1.78 0.836 46.2% 50.0% -1.50 1–0 -0.03
16 2001 1472 97.6 33.3% -1.67 0–2 +0.24 2006 1510 102.3 -1.61 -2.20 0.893 47.7% 37.5% -0.87 1–1 +0.29
17 2002 1471 102.7 0.0% -6.00 -0.24 2007 1570 120.8 -1.99 +1.24 0.957 48.9% -48 +43 48.7% -0.13 2–3 (40%) 3–0 (100%) 102.1 -0.22
18 2003 1428 97.9 -0.28 +0.13 0.926 48.1% +37 23.1% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 1–1 -0.11 2008 1782 146.7 +0.62 +3.01 1.067 51.6% -112 +74 59.5% +0.78 11–8 (58%) 6–4 (60%) 107.5 -0.33
19 2004 1446 108.5 +27 41.7% -0.09 1–1 0–3 (0%) +0.26 2009 1663 128.7 -2.23 +1.23 0.955 49.3% +16 +59 45.1% -0.31 8–6 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 103.5 -0.18
20 2005 1489 107.8 +15 33.3% -1.42 2–0 1–0 -0.17 2010 1611 121.0 -1.21 +1.16 1.003 50.1% +7 +76 48.8% +0.02 4–8 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.2 -0.69
21 2006 1572 122.2 +0.43 -1.68 0.943 48.6% +8 -91 +26 43.1% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 100.0 -0.91 2011 1562 123.0 -3.16 +0.65 0.933 48.4% +57 +60 39.3% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 0–4 (0%) 94.7 -1.01
22 2007 1591 123.2 +1.17 -0.38 1.004 49.7% +13 +9 40.7% -0.26 0–1 0–2 -0.75 2012 1640 126.5 -2.48 +2.74 1.023 50.5% -34 +105 -109 50.0% -0.20 5–3 (63%) 7–1 (88%) 108.0 +0.06
23 2008 1701 126.2 +0.68 +1.30 1.057 51.4% -35 -233 +73 57.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 +1.78 2013 1731 137.4 -0.53 +2.45 1.040 51.0% -10 +13 -220 54.9% +0.32 12–10 (55%) 10–5 (67%) 106.1 +0.65
24 2009 1625 117.3 -1.61 -0.51 0.884 47.3% +19 -138 36.2% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 100.2 -1.14 2014 1792 145.4 +0.93 +3.61 1.080 51.7% +29 -135 -154 54.2% +0.46 17–9 (65%) 8–12 (40%) 104.0 -0.76
25 2010 1706 132.3 +2.85 +1.63 1.105 52.1% -12 -173 -19 53.8% +0.32 4–7 (36%) 1–4 (20%) 95.8 -1.05 2015 1631 126.7 -0.36 +1.69 1.041 50.7% +22 +52 -29 47.9% -0.03 10–11 (48%) 1–7 (13%) 91.6 +1.81
26 2011 1710 132.8 +1.02 +2.01 1.066 51.4% -2 -69 53.9% +0.33 7–7 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.1 -0.55 2016 1704 131.6 -0.75 +1.42 0.982 49.8% +19 -93 -99 48.9% +0.14 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 98.3 +0.07
27 2012 1667 120.6 +0.55 -1.32 0.945 48.5% -24 43.8% -0.37 0–4 (0%) 2–0 -1.24 2017 1755 137.4 -2.79 +3.62 1.006 50.0% +35 -111 -216 51.0% +0.11 7–8 (47%) 3–5 (38%) 94.5 -0.01
28 2013 1691 135.2 +2.51 +1.00 1.067 51.5% -81 +69 52.1% +0.58 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 100.2 -0.57 2018 1689 134.8 -1.25 +1.50 1.004 50.1% -15 +85 -137 48.1% -0.04 6–8 (43%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 -0.03
29 2014 1611 124.9 -0.22 +1.80 0.936 48.9% -60 38.5% -0.69 0–4 (0%) 0–1 -0.42 2019 1699 130.0 +0.27 +3.19 1.115 52.5% -21 +47 -95 56.7% +0.59 3–7 (30%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 +1.36
30 2015 1680 127.9 +0.59 +0.51 1.006 50.5% -53 -16 -8 50.7% +0.25 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.68 2020 1771 138.5 +0.58 +1.50 1.044 51.5% +8 -35 55.3% +0.64 5–2 (71%) 3–3 (50%) 103.6 +0.16
31 2016 1580 121.1 -1.28 -1.16 0.918 48.2% -19 +56 37.7% -0.77 3–10 (23%) 4–2 (67%) 96.4 -1.05 2021 1744 132.4 -0.78 +2.82 1.016 50.4% +5 -128 -57 48.1% +0.06 10–4 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 106.9 -1.70
32 2017 1673 126.6 -1.67 +2.39 0.975 49.6% -21 +4 50.0% -0.17 3–1 (75%) 2–0 -0.16 2022 1753 141.3 +0.38 +1.27 1.028 50.7% -22 -126 +32 55.3% +0.44 7–11 (39%) 6–5 (55%) 98.5 +0.59
33 2018 1608 112.8 0.00 -2.91 0.814 46.1% +12 +23 25.0% -1.44 0–2 0–3 (0%) -0.29 2023 1671 113.6 -1.47 -0.64 0.957 49.0% -36 -30 +86 39.4% -0.37 7–4 (64%) 2–7 (22%) 98.9 +0.47
34 2019 1589 112.7 -1.45 -1.61 0.756 43.6% -1 30.0% -1.50 1–1 0–1 -0.11 2024 1607 107.6 -3.28 -1.77 0.763 44.3% -37 +7 16.7% -2.50 1–1 -0.48
35 2020 1609 112.8 -0.17 +0.01 0.752 43.4% 0.0% -3.00 0–1 +0.19 2025 1554 97.7 +1.43 +0.15 0.615 38.0% 0.0% -4.50 +0.01
36 2021 1599 112.0 +0.16 -1.07 0.936 50.3% +10 44.4% +0.22 1–0 1–1 +0.19
37 2022 1587 101.1
38 2023 1546 101.7 -1.87 -2.19 0.688 39.1% 0.0% -4.00 -0.04
39 2024 1533 97.8
40 2025 1531 101.2
Career 1779 132.2 +0.56 +0.45 0.989 49.8% -20 -58 +32 46.0% -0.19 45–67 (40%) 30–41 (42%) 92.4 -1.80 1884 138.4 -0.83 +2.02 1.016 50.4% -1 +21 -65 50.3% +0.12 127–114 (53%) 74–76 (49%) 101.7 0.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.