H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic vs Na Li H2H: 0-3
Na Li holds a 3–0 lead over Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2013 Beijing third round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2013* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Na Li | 6-0 6-1 | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | Match data |
| Jan 5, 2013* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Na Li | 6-3 6-3 | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2011* | Sydney | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Na Li | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | #546 | #32 | 1,485 | 1,737 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Na Li | #9 | #2 | 7,585 | 2,124 | 334 | 155 | 68.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | Na Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2010 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #73 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 6–1 | 85.7% | #78 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2015 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #56 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #725 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #21 | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #29 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,518 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #11 | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #5 | 1,868 | 1 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #7 | 2,016 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #3 | 2,077 | 1 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 29–7 | 80.6% | #9 | 2,031 | 2 | 9 |