H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Camila Giorgi vs Su-Wei Hsieh H2H: 1-1

Camila Giorgi and Su-Wei Hsieh are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Su-Wei Hsieh leads 1–0 on grass, while Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Su-Wei Hsieh won the 2019 Eastbourne Open round of 64 6-3 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Camila Giorgi
Italy Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Su-Wei Hsieh
Chinese Taipei Age 40 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Su-Wei Hsieh #29 6-3 4-6 6-4 Camila Giorgi #41 Match data Jun 26, 2019* R64 Eastbourne Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Camila Giorgi #136 6-4 7-6(8) Su-Wei Hsieh #40 Match data Aug 29, 2013* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Camila Giorgi #116 #26 1,978 1,899 211 188 52.9% 0 1 0 0 3 4
Su-Wei Hsieh #909 #23 1,960 1,880 153 176 46.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Camila Giorgi Su-Wei Hsieh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 5–2 71.4% #164 1,548 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #267 1,540 0 0
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #151 1,486 0 0 2005 0–3 0.0% #142 1,506 0 0
20 2012 6–10 37.5% #75 1,523 0 0 2006 0–4 0.0% #129 1,462 0 0
21 2013 8–11 42.1% #98 1,578 0 0 2007 1–7 12.5% #157 1,419 0 0
22 2014 27–19 58.7% #34 1,709 0 0 2008 5–8 38.5% #81 1,483 0 0
23 2015 26–21 55.3% #35 1,727 0 1 2009 1–2 33.3% #314 1,473 0 0
24 2016 16–20 44.4% #82 1,645 0 1 2010 0–2 0.0% #362 1,454 0 0
25 2017 15–13 53.6% #78 1,759 0 1 2011 1–1 50.0% #172 1,458 0 0
26 2018 29–16 64.4% #26 1,866 0 2 2012 22–14 61.1% #25 1,672 0 2
27 2019 13–15 46.4% #100 1,749 0 2 2013 13–25 34.2% #86 1,554 0 2
28 2020 10–9 52.6% #76 1,736 0 2 2014 6–12 33.3% #141 1,542 0 2
29 2021 24–17 58.5% #33 1,829 0 3 2015 6–5 54.5% #93 1,581 0 2
30 2022 14–16 46.7% #66 1,769 0 3 2016 12–12 50.0% #87 1,586 0 2
31 2023 20–15 57.1% #53 1,790 0 4 2017 8–15 34.8% #82 1,600 0 2
32 2024 3–5 37.5% #116 1,762 0 4 2018 32–17 65.3% #28 1,778 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2019 31–24 56.4% #32 1,781 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2020 1–7 12.5% #67 1,706 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2021 9–14 39.1% #108 1,686 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 2023 0–1 0.0% #713 1,658 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Camila Giorgi Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2012 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2006 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2013 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2014 17 11 28 60.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2015 17 15 32 53.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 2016 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2017 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2018 15 9 24 62.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 2012 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2019 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 10 18 28 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2021 16 10 26 61.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 2015 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2022 5 8 13 38.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 2016 6 6 12 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 2023 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2017 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 2024 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2018 21 9 30 70.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 23 16 39 59.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 9 9 18 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 131 117 248 52.8% 38 40 78 48.7% 42 31 73 57.5% — 112 112 224 50.0% 21 37 58 36.2% 20 27 47 42.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 366/400 of Camila Giorgi's and 285/321 of Su-Wei Hsieh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Camila Giorgi Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2011 1/1 3.0 7.0 53.3% 66.7% 28.6% 33.3% 0.0% 48.9% 26.5% 2005 1/3 0.0 1.0 68.9% 45.2% 28.6% 44.4% 0.0% 40.0% 31.9%
20 2012 16/16 1.7 7.4 53.8% 66.1% 42.4% 53.5% 42.4% 55.1% 43.4% 2006 2/4 0.0 1.5 70.8% 54.2% 53.1% 56.9% 10.7% 53.2% 36.5%
21 2013 16/19 2.0 7.7 56.3% 63.1% 45.2% 50.3% 46.6% 54.9% 42.7% 2007 3/8 0.3 3.0 58.2% 61.7% 45.8% 57.9% 26.5% 55.0% 34.9%
22 2014 44/46 3.2 8.2 53.9% 70.1% 49.0% 53.4% 44.4% 60.3% 43.8% 2008 11/13 1.1 3.7 53.2% 62.4% 43.3% 51.4% 38.7% 53.6% 42.4%
23 2015 36/47 3.1 10.5 60.2% 68.8% 54.7% 56.5% 54.2% 63.0% 41.9% 2009 3/3 0.3 3.7 58.9% 51.8% 46.8% 29.4% 52.6% 49.8% 48.1%
24 2016 32/37 2.0 6.9 56.7% 62.8% 45.8% 51.5% 46.0% 55.4% 42.1% 2010 2/2 0.5 4.0 60.9% 63.3% 38.7% 52.2% 46.3% 53.7% 43.8%
25 2017 27/28 2.9 6.5 56.0% 64.5% 47.9% 50.1% 45.3% 57.4% 42.1% 2011 2/2 0.0 2.5 62.8% 59.0% 52.3% 72.4% 57.5% 56.4% 54.5%
26 2018 43/45 3.5 5.0 59.2% 67.0% 49.8% 51.2% 49.9% 60.1% 44.6% 2012 29/36 0.6 2.5 64.5% 63.4% 48.2% 50.2% 45.6% 58.1% 47.7%
27 2019 25/28 2.7 6.0 55.8% 62.6% 46.0% 48.7% 52.2% 55.2% 44.3% 2013 33/38 0.7 3.0 62.9% 54.8% 42.6% 45.6% 49.0% 50.2% 43.3%
28 2020 19/19 2.7 6.7 56.5% 64.6% 47.6% 49.2% 45.0% 57.4% 41.2% 2014 14/18 0.9 2.6 61.9% 54.6% 40.0% 41.3% 41.6% 49.3% 42.3%
29 2021 34/41 3.5 6.8 54.2% 67.0% 48.5% 46.3% 49.1% 58.5% 44.1% 2015 7/11 2.1 2.9 61.0% 61.1% 53.7% 55.2% 49.1% 58.2% 41.7%
30 2022 30/30 2.4 7.3 54.3% 66.8% 44.8% 45.9% 48.2% 56.7% 43.5% 2016 24/24 1.1 2.6 58.5% 61.5% 47.9% 48.7% 43.8% 55.8% 43.3%
31 2023 35/35 3.0 6.3 56.0% 67.8% 45.8% 56.8% 46.0% 58.2% 45.1% 2017 23/23 1.1 2.7 63.4% 56.9% 39.7% 45.0% 49.8% 50.5% 44.3%
32 2024 8/8 3.8 7.0 54.0% 68.3% 42.3% 64.2% 47.5% 56.5% 37.4% 2018 46/49 0.8 3.1 63.3% 60.9% 47.5% 57.5% 54.0% 56.0% 47.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 53/55 0.7 3.2 64.4% 61.9% 46.6% 51.7% 47.6% 56.5% 44.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 8/8 0.1 3.0 61.2% 53.2% 42.9% 42.4% 53.9% 48.9% 40.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 23/23 0.7 3.1 64.0% 55.2% 43.8% 49.8% 41.6% 51.7% 43.2%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 64.9% 60.0% 44.4% 16.7% 45.5% 54.5% 45.5%
Career — 366/400 2.9 7.1 56.2% 66.5% 47.7% 51.6% 47.6% 58.2% 43.2% — 285/329 0.8 2.9 62.6% 59.3% 45.3% 50.0% 47.0% 54.1% 44.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Camila Giorgi Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1548 108.6 — — — — +31 — — 63.2% +1.00 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +1.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1541 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.23
19 2011 1486 95.9 -1.46 -1.61 0.519 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 2005 1506 99.1 -0.87 -2.03 0.532 35.9% +18 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.18
20 2012 1524 109.2 -0.06 -0.52 0.966 49.3% -40 — +152 37.5% -0.78 0–2 1–1 — +0.04 2006 1462 97.2 -0.43 -2.06 0.780 45.6% — — — 11.1% -2.11 0–1 — — +0.03
21 2013 1578 118.6 -0.28 -0.45 0.945 49.0% -55 -44 +82 45.2% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 -0.04 2007 1419 94.3 -0.52 -2.42 0.776 45.0% +29 — — 22.2% -2.00 0–2 0–1 — -0.15
22 2014 1710 139.3 +3.53 +0.42 1.105 51.9% -5 -132 +5 57.3% +0.60 9–11 (45%) 9–9 (50%) 101.9 +0.57 2008 1483 115.6 -0.18 -0.54 0.915 47.9% +35 -31 — 40.0% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.39
23 2015 1728 132.8 +4.03 +0.45 1.135 52.6% -8 -203 +75 51.9% +0.18 10–8 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 99.6 -0.69 2009 1473 99.4 -1.34 -1.35 0.959 48.9% +30 — — 33.3% -0.83 — — — +0.39
24 2016 1645 130.4 -0.24 -0.73 0.944 49.0% +10 -57 +63 44.9% -0.37 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -2.53 2010 1454 101.1 -0.49 +0.07 0.946 48.5% — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–2 — -0.03
25 2017 1760 124.4 +1.05 -0.11 0.987 50.1% -52 -146 +35 49.3% +0.18 10–3 (77%) 5–7 (42%) 106.2 -1.25 2011 1459 105.4 -0.05 -0.94 1.250 55.5% — — — 60.0% +1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.27
26 2018 1866 142.2 +3.05 +1.65 1.117 52.4% -27 -140 -22 61.6% +0.82 6–5 (55%) 4–1 (80%) 104.5 -0.86 2012 1672 133.4 +1.38 +2.74 1.138 52.7% -4 -182 -35 58.2% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.4 +0.40
27 2019 1750 138.4 -0.54 +0.95 0.989 49.8% +3 — — 50.8% +0.24 3–6 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 95.3 -0.70 2013 1554 116.0 -3.73 +0.15 0.871 46.8% +4 -81 +19 37.6% -1.02 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) 97.2 -0.23
28 2020 1737 130.8 +0.83 -1.43 0.968 49.3% +18 -34 — 53.2% -0.11 6–5 (55%) 6–0 (100%) 104.5 -0.95 2014 1542 107.7 -3.95 -1.33 0.834 45.9% +33 — — 35.7% -1.24 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.6 +0.26
29 2021 1829 139.7 +1.63 +1.37 1.062 51.2% -14 -167 +30 57.8% +0.65 8–4 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 103.6 -1.02 2015 1582 111.2 -0.41 -0.09 0.996 50.3% +31 — — 48.1% +0.04 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — +0.05
30 2022 1770 135.5 +0.11 +1.41 1.004 50.0% 0 -96 +100 52.1% +0.13 4–9 (31%) 3–5 (38%) 93.9 +0.10 2016 1586 119.0 -0.64 +0.61 0.979 49.4% -1 -70 -44 47.4% -0.11 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.11
31 2023 1791 142.9 +1.46 +1.59 1.078 51.6% +17 -99 +67 59.7% +0.61 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 99.9 -1.28 2017 1601 109.3 -4.02 +0.80 0.895 47.4% -15 -59 -29 37.0% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +0.19
32 2024 1762 129.7 +0.86 -0.25 0.860 47.5% +11 — — 42.1% -0.68 1–2 (33%) — — -1.16 2018 1778 132.6 -0.63 +4.07 1.073 51.5% -22 -182 -83 58.2% +0.56 12–6 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 108.9 -0.49
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1781 146.5 +0.12 +2.75 1.033 50.7% +29 -185 -15 52.6% +0.24 16–9 (64%) 10–8 (56%) 107.5 -1.32
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1707 118.1 -2.64 +0.13 0.796 44.9% +27 -121 — 17.6% -2.35 0–1 1–0 — -0.47
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1687 126.8 -2.62 -0.02 0.895 47.4% +64 -177 — 43.1% -0.80 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) — -1.53
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1658 96.7 -0.52 -0.38 1.002 49.4% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.20
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1628 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1900 141.2 +1.54 +0.55 1.033 50.7% -8 -112 +54 52.9% +0.22 66–68 (49%) 56–41 (58%) 104.4 -2.43 — 1881 128.6 -1.28 +1.43 0.970 49.3% +14 -131 -34 46.0% -0.30 63–56 (53%) 39–44 (47%) 103.9 -0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.