Camila Osorio
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Li | 2 | 4 | 6 | Aug 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Kamilla Rakhimova | 5 | 0 | 5 | Sep 10, 2025 | H2H |
| Ons Jabeur | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 16, 2025 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Anna Kalinskaya | 2 | 2 | 4 | May 30, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Camila Osorio vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 1-0
Camila Osorio holds a 1–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camila Osorio leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camila Osorio won the 2021 Tenerife quarterfinal 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | 7-5 6-1 | Saisai Zheng | Match data | Oct 23, 2021* | QF | Tenerife | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | #59 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,826 | 104 | 96 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 87 | 133 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #55 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #85 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,718 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #59 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #38 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2013 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2014 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2015 | 8 | 17 | 25 | 32.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2024 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2016 | 10 | 17 | 27 | 37.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 23 | 2025 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2017 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2026 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2018 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 52.9% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 47 | 58 | 105 | 44.8% | 52 | 25 | 77 | 67.5% | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% | — | 75 | 100 | 175 | 42.9% | 8 | 20 | 28 | 28.6% | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 184/202 of Camila Osorio's and 195/218 of Saisai Zheng's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2018 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 60.0% | 61.9% | 32.1% | 58.3% | 28.6% | 50.0% | 36.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 7.0 | 57.8% | 62.9% | 46.8% | 57.1% | 41.6% | 56.3% | 47.6% | 2011 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 57.0% | 46.2% | 38.1% | 48.6% | 17.7% | 43.0% | 38.5% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5/5 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 59.6% | 59.8% | 41.1% | 51.6% | 46.4% | 52.1% | 43.1% |
| 19 | 2021 | 29/30 | 1.4 | 5.3 | 63.1% | 61.1% | 38.4% | 51.1% | 49.0% | 52.7% | 48.0% | 2013 | 4/4 | 1.8 | 3.8 | 63.2% | 56.7% | 39.1% | 50.4% | 42.0% | 50.4% | 45.6% |
| 20 | 2022 | 30/31 | 1.2 | 4.1 | 68.6% | 59.0% | 40.9% | 50.2% | 44.0% | 53.3% | 44.7% | 2014 | 8/12 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 66.9% | 56.0% | 51.5% | 45.6% | 52.8% | 54.4% | 45.8% |
| 21 | 2023 | 32/32 | 0.7 | 5.3 | 64.2% | 60.6% | 42.3% | 50.7% | 40.1% | 53.9% | 44.9% | 2015 | 20/31 | 0.9 | 2.2 | 66.6% | 52.7% | 45.0% | 41.5% | 52.4% | 50.4% | 40.2% |
| 22 | 2024 | 32/35 | 1.2 | 5.0 | 64.8% | 58.9% | 40.8% | 49.3% | 52.1% | 52.4% | 45.4% | 2016 | 34/37 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 63.7% | 56.5% | 46.6% | 51.9% | 45.9% | 52.5% | 44.2% |
| 23 | 2025 | 26/38 | 1.8 | 6.1 | 62.6% | 61.7% | 40.2% | 54.1% | 46.6% | 53.8% | 44.7% | 2017 | 15/15 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 65.3% | 54.2% | 43.1% | 51.6% | 58.7% | 49.8% | 38.9% |
| 24 | 2026 | 31/32 | 1.5 | 5.7 | 63.7% | 62.3% | 44.9% | 50.3% | 52.9% | 55.7% | 45.9% | 2018 | 21/25 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 66.8% | 58.5% | 45.1% | 54.0% | 49.2% | 54.0% | 45.2% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 44/44 | 1.4 | 2.7 | 64.7% | 59.2% | 44.3% | 49.7% | 45.7% | 53.7% | 43.6% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10/10 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 70.3% | 62.9% | 43.1% | 43.5% | 45.9% | 57.5% | 46.4% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 26/27 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 67.3% | 58.4% | 47.9% | 53.1% | 43.0% | 54.9% | 42.5% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6/6 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 62.2% | 51.9% | 44.6% | 40.1% | 45.4% | 49.1% | 39.6% |
| Career | — | 184/202 | 1.3 | 5.3 | 64.4% | 60.6% | 41.4% | 51.0% | 47.3% | 53.7% | 45.6% | — | 195/220 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 65.4% | 57.2% | 45.2% | 49.6% | 47.4% | 52.9% | 43.1% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 2016 | 1483 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2017 | 1465 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 1454 | 96.2 | -0.76 | -2.99 | 0.738 | 43.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 1488 | 103.3 | +0.83 | +0.51 | 1.091 | 51.8% | — | +17 | — | 62.5% | +0.75 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 | 2011 | 1474 | 95.9 | -1.89 | -2.23 | 0.676 | 41.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.25 | — | — | — | +0.25 |
| 18 | 2020 | 1483 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1483 | 99.4 | -0.72 | -1.45 | 0.900 | 48.2% | +11 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.55 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.37 |
| 19 | 2021 | 1699 | 120.1 | -2.66 | +3.25 | 1.014 | 50.4% | -108 | +13 | -63 | 52.3% | +0.08 | 7–0 (100%) | 3–4 (43%) | 107.0 | -0.69 | 2013 | 1468 | 100.9 | -1.08 | +0.55 | 0.920 | 48.0% | +5 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.00 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.17 |
| 20 | 2022 | 1689 | 126.5 | -2.72 | +0.83 | 0.957 | 48.9% | -8 | +34 | -184 | 48.3% | -0.35 | 3–3 (50%) | 9–7 (56%) | 104.1 | +0.85 | 2014 | 1553 | 119.6 | -1.26 | +0.86 | 1.006 | 49.7% | +9 | — | — | 53.3% | -0.23 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.37 |
| 21 | 2023 | 1731 | 132.4 | -1.96 | +1.86 | 0.974 | 49.5% | -54 | +87 | -241 | 52.9% | -0.04 | 6–2 (75%) | 6–3 (67%) | 106.3 | -2.02 | 2015 | 1496 | 110.7 | -5.38 | -1.24 | 0.811 | 45.6% | +9 | +30 | +74 | 30.9% | -1.50 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–1 (67%) | 105.2 | -0.08 |
| 22 | 2024 | 1757 | 132.8 | -3.36 | +0.94 | 0.954 | 49.1% | -66 | +105 | -187 | 53.8% | +0.01 | 5–9 (36%) | 9–4 (69%) | 100.9 | -0.70 | 2016 | 1542 | 123.0 | -2.10 | +1.09 | 0.930 | 48.2% | +24 | -74 | +9 | 40.0% | -0.83 | 0–8 (0%) | 2–2 (50%) | 91.8 | +0.81 |
| 23 | 2025 | 1719 | 136.8 | -2.42 | +1.16 | 0.969 | 49.3% | -24 | +106 | — | 51.7% | +0.08 | 9–5 (64%) | 2–5 (29%) | 101.1 | -0.23 | 2017 | 1619 | 110.1 | -3.22 | -1.56 | 0.775 | 44.5% | -8 | -100 | — | 34.2% | -1.42 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–1 (75%) | 104.9 | -0.08 |
| 24 | 2026 | 1745 | 142.0 | -1.22 | +2.82 | 1.037 | 50.9% | +16 | +70 | — | 48.7% | +0.10 | 6–7 (46%) | 3–7 (30%) | 97.1 | -1.01 | 2018 | 1679 | 118.9 | -1.21 | +1.53 | 0.983 | 49.6% | +22 | -169 | -79 | 54.5% | +0.13 | 3–4 (43%) | 0–1 | — | +1.42 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1750 | 134.4 | -2.18 | +0.80 | 0.942 | 48.7% | -10 | -123 | -200 | 48.0% | -0.28 | 8–6 (57%) | 11–3 (79%) | 107.3 | +0.31 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1768 | 132.2 | +0.85 | +2.96 | 1.090 | 51.7% | -8 | — | — | 58.3% | +0.58 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.03 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1686 | 121.1 | -1.18 | -0.16 | 0.941 | 48.6% | -18 | -68 | — | 38.7% | -0.89 | 4–4 (50%) | 1–1 | — | -0.36 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1548 | 93.3 | -2.71 | -2.47 | 0.779 | 44.6% | -4 | — | — | 26.7% | -1.73 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.51 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1492 | 101.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.25 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.05 |
| Career | — | 1826 | 136.1 | -2.33 | +1.77 | 0.984 | 49.7% | -34 | +69 | -164 | 51.3% | -0.01 | 37–27 (58%) | 32–31 (51%) | 106.7 | -1.82 | — | 1777 | 123.8 | -2.10 | +0.33 | 0.915 | 48.0% | +3 | -88 | -35 | 41.7% | -0.74 | 31–38 (45%) | 23–16 (59%) | 104.4 | +1.33 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Saisai Zheng
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison Riske-Amritraj | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 13, 2019 | H2H |
| Qiang Wang | 1 | 4 | 5 | May 28, 2019 | H2H |
| Simona Halep | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 3, 2021 | H2H |
| Stefanie Voegele | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 9, 2021 | H2H |
| Lin Zhu | 3 | 0 | 3 | Mar 19, 2021 | H2H |