H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Carla Suárez Navarro vs Kai-Chen Chang H2H: 0-1
Kai-Chen Chang holds a 1–0 lead over Carla Suárez Navarro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kai-Chen Chang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kai-Chen Chang won the 2010 US Open first round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 37
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2010* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kai-Chen Chang | 6-2 6-4 | Carla Suárez Navarro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carla Suárez Navarro | #342 | #6 | 4,015 | 2,022 | 339 | 247 | 57.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Carla Suárez Navarro | Kai-Chen Chang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #49 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #17 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #17 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 1,812 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |