H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 10:30 UTC
Caroline Garcia vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 1-0
Caroline Garcia holds a 1–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Caroline Garcia leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Caroline Garcia won the 2015 Beijing second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2015* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 6-2 6-2 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Caroline Garcia | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |