H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Caroline Garcia vs Su-Wei Hsieh H2H: 4-0
Caroline Garcia holds a 4–0 lead over Su-Wei Hsieh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Caroline Garcia leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Caroline Garcia won the 2019 Madrid second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 40
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2019 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Caroline Garcia | 7-5 6-2 | Su-Wei Hsieh | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2018* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 6-3 6-4 | Su-Wei Hsieh | Match data |
| Jun 21, 2018* | Mallorca | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Caroline Garcia | 7-6(4) 1-6 6-4 | Su-Wei Hsieh | Match data |
| Jun 3, 2017* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Caroline Garcia | 6-4 4-6 9-7 | Su-Wei Hsieh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| Su-Wei Hsieh | #909 | #23 | 1,960 | 1,874 | 150 | 173 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Caroline Garcia | Su-Wei Hsieh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #164 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #157 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #362 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #25 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #86 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #93 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 | 2016 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 | 2017 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #82 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #32 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #67 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #108 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |