H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Caroline Garcia vs Su-Wei Hsieh H2H: 4-0

Caroline Garcia holds a 4–0 lead over Su-Wei Hsieh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Caroline Garcia leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Caroline Garcia won the 2019 Madrid Open first round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Caroline Garcia
France Age 32 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main-draw meetings
Su-Wei Hsieh
Chinese Taipei Age 40 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Caroline Garcia #22 7-5 6-2 Su-Wei Hsieh #25 Match data May 6, 2019 R64 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Caroline Garcia #16 6-3 6-4 Su-Wei Hsieh #30 Match data Oct 13, 2018* SF Tianjin International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Caroline Garcia #6 7-6(4) 1-6 6-4 Su-Wei Hsieh #52 Match data Jun 21, 2018* R32 Mallorca International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Caroline Garcia #27 6-4 4-6 9-7 Su-Wei Hsieh #109 Match data Jun 3, 2017* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Caroline Garcia #452 #4 5,170 2,002 337 268 55.7% 0 3 1 0 7 11
Su-Wei Hsieh #909 #23 1,960 1,880 153 176 46.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Caroline Garcia Su-Wei Hsieh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 5–2 71.4% #164 1,548 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #267 1,540 0 0
17 2011 2–4 33.3% #142 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 1–6 14.3% #154 1,445 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2013 8–14 36.4% #74 1,482 0 0 2005 0–3 0.0% #142 1,506 0 0
20 2014 24–23 51.1% #37 1,662 0 1 2006 0–4 0.0% #129 1,462 0 0
21 2015 28–24 53.8% #34 1,706 0 1 2007 1–7 12.5% #157 1,419 0 0
22 2016 32–24 57.1% #24 1,744 0 3 2008 5–8 38.5% #81 1,483 0 0
23 2017 48–22 68.6% #8 1,974 0 5 2009 1–2 33.3% #314 1,473 0 0
24 2018 39–22 63.9% #19 1,922 0 6 2010 0–2 0.0% #362 1,454 0 0
25 2019 24–24 50.0% #46 1,719 0 7 2011 1–1 50.0% #172 1,458 0 0
26 2020 11–11 50.0% #43 1,745 0 7 2012 22–14 61.1% #25 1,672 0 2
27 2021 21–24 46.7% #74 1,694 0 7 2013 13–25 34.2% #86 1,554 0 2
28 2022 44–20 68.8% #4 1,984 0 11 2014 6–12 33.3% #141 1,542 0 2
29 2023 36–26 58.1% #20 1,832 0 11 2015 6–5 54.5% #93 1,581 0 2
30 2024 15–15 50.0% #48 1,763 0 11 2016 12–12 50.0% #87 1,586 0 2
31 2025 4–9 30.8% #304 1,723 0 11 2017 8–15 34.8% #82 1,600 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2018 32–17 65.3% #28 1,778 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2019 31–24 56.4% #32 1,781 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2020 1–7 12.5% #67 1,706 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2021 9–14 39.1% #108 1,686 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 2023 0–1 0.0% #713 1,658 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Caroline Garcia Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 12 15 27 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2015 21 16 37 56.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2016 19 17 36 52.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2017 30 14 44 68.2% 12 6 18 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 24 15 39 61.5% 13 5 18 72.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2019 8 15 23 34.8% 9 7 16 56.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2020 7 8 15 46.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2012 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
27 2021 12 16 28 42.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 10 18 28 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
28 2022 23 14 37 62.2% 11 3 14 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2023 26 19 45 57.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2015 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2024 8 9 17 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 6 6 12 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 2025 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 21 9 30 70.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 23 16 39 59.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 9 9 18 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 201 181 382 52.6% 92 62 154 59.7% 44 24 68 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — 112 112 224 50.0% 21 37 58 36.2% 20 27 47 42.6% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 568/605 of Caroline Garcia's and 285/321 of Su-Wei Hsieh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Caroline Garcia Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 6/6 4.8 6.8 56.1% 65.4% 41.9% 59.0% 47.0% 55.5% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 7/7 3.1 8.6 53.2% 69.6% 38.1% 46.5% 51.6% 54.7% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 19/22 4.5 5.2 58.7% 66.4% 44.4% 53.4% 39.9% 57.2% 36.5% 2005 1/3 0.0 1.0 68.9% 45.2% 28.6% 44.4% 0.0% 40.0% 31.9%
20 2014 43/47 3.7 4.2 59.0% 65.3% 46.8% 53.2% 37.7% 57.7% 39.9% 2006 2/4 0.0 1.5 70.8% 54.2% 53.1% 56.9% 10.7% 53.2% 36.5%
21 2015 43/52 4.3 4.2 65.3% 67.1% 54.0% 53.7% 49.4% 62.2% 38.3% 2007 3/8 0.3 3.0 58.2% 61.7% 45.8% 57.9% 26.5% 55.0% 34.9%
22 2016 48/56 4.1 2.9 60.5% 65.9% 50.1% 48.2% 44.0% 59.7% 41.3% 2008 11/13 1.1 3.7 53.2% 62.4% 43.3% 51.4% 38.7% 53.6% 42.4%
23 2017 66/70 5.0 2.9 63.6% 67.4% 50.7% 56.8% 46.3% 61.4% 42.6% 2009 3/3 0.3 3.7 58.9% 51.8% 46.8% 29.4% 52.6% 49.8% 48.1%
24 2018 60/61 4.1 2.2 67.1% 65.9% 52.1% 57.7% 47.2% 61.4% 41.3% 2010 2/2 0.5 4.0 60.9% 63.3% 38.7% 52.2% 46.3% 53.7% 43.8%
25 2019 48/48 4.0 2.1 67.3% 64.4% 50.8% 55.3% 43.5% 59.7% 39.7% 2011 2/2 0.0 2.5 62.8% 59.0% 52.3% 72.4% 57.5% 56.4% 54.5%
26 2020 22/22 3.5 2.9 62.0% 63.6% 48.2% 57.3% 43.1% 57.5% 39.4% 2012 29/36 0.6 2.5 64.5% 63.4% 48.2% 50.2% 45.6% 58.1% 47.7%
27 2021 44/45 3.8 2.7 62.5% 62.9% 49.4% 53.2% 46.8% 57.8% 40.8% 2013 33/38 0.7 3.0 62.9% 54.8% 42.6% 45.6% 49.0% 50.2% 43.3%
28 2022 63/64 6.4 3.1 60.9% 71.6% 48.8% 60.0% 49.2% 62.6% 39.9% 2014 14/18 0.9 2.6 61.9% 54.6% 40.0% 41.3% 41.6% 49.3% 42.3%
29 2023 62/62 7.3 3.3 60.2% 72.6% 49.5% 63.5% 42.9% 63.4% 38.5% 2015 7/11 2.1 2.9 61.0% 61.1% 53.7% 55.2% 49.1% 58.2% 41.7%
30 2024 28/30 7.4 3.4 59.1% 71.5% 45.7% 56.9% 41.2% 61.0% 38.2% 2016 24/24 1.1 2.6 58.5% 61.5% 47.9% 48.7% 43.8% 55.8% 43.3%
31 2025 9/13 3.6 2.1 60.1% 60.1% 43.7% 44.1% 49.0% 53.8% 38.4% 2017 23/23 1.1 2.7 63.4% 56.9% 39.7% 45.0% 49.8% 50.5% 44.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 46/49 0.8 3.1 63.3% 60.9% 47.5% 57.5% 54.0% 56.0% 47.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 53/55 0.7 3.2 64.4% 61.9% 46.6% 51.7% 47.6% 56.5% 44.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 8/8 0.1 3.0 61.2% 53.2% 42.9% 42.4% 53.9% 48.9% 40.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 23/23 0.7 3.1 64.0% 55.2% 43.8% 49.8% 41.6% 51.7% 43.2%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 64.9% 60.0% 44.4% 16.7% 45.5% 54.5% 45.5%
Career — 568/605 4.9 3.2 62.3% 67.3% 49.4% 55.9% 45.1% 60.4% 40.0% — 285/329 0.8 2.9 62.6% 59.3% 45.3% 50.0% 47.0% 54.1% 44.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Caroline Garcia Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1548 108.6 — — — — +31 — — 63.2% +1.00 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +1.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1541 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.23
17 2011 1481 101.2 -0.19 -2.02 0.913 48.6% +22 — — 43.8% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1445 110.6 -0.32 -1.39 0.894 47.7% +27 — — 29.4% -0.88 0–3 (0%) 0–4 (0%) 93.9 +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1482 118.4 +1.16 -4.52 0.853 47.3% +6 +27 — 43.1% -0.73 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 94.0 +0.45 2005 1506 99.1 -0.87 -2.03 0.532 35.9% +18 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.18
20 2014 1663 133.8 +1.54 -2.76 0.944 49.0% -72 +18 -59 47.6% -0.30 9–6 (60%) 10–4 (71%) 110.4 -0.60 2006 1462 97.2 -0.43 -2.06 0.780 45.6% — — — 11.1% -2.11 0–1 — — +0.03
21 2015 1707 139.3 +3.93 -2.34 1.013 50.3% +9 -53 -109 52.5% +0.25 8–12 (40%) 7–7 (50%) 96.8 -0.37 2007 1419 94.3 -0.52 -2.42 0.776 45.0% +29 — — 22.2% -2.00 0–2 0–1 — -0.15
22 2016 1744 133.4 +3.27 -1.52 1.024 50.5% -17 -73 -40 53.9% +0.16 11–9 (55%) 9–4 (69%) 106.8 -0.69 2008 1483 115.6 -0.18 -0.54 0.915 47.9% +35 -31 — 40.0% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.39
23 2017 1974 148.7 +4.65 -0.54 1.105 52.2% -2 -211 -177 62.7% +0.87 16–5 (76%) 12–9 (57%) 110.2 +0.32 2009 1473 99.4 -1.34 -1.35 0.959 48.9% +30 — — 33.3% -0.83 — — — +0.39
24 2018 1923 152.6 +4.38 -0.48 1.070 51.3% +7 -19 -150 60.4% +0.59 13–8 (62%) 7–12 (37%) 99.7 -0.23 2010 1454 101.1 -0.49 +0.07 0.946 48.5% — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–2 — -0.03
25 2019 1719 131.2 +2.32 -2.18 0.987 49.9% +13 +100 +151 47.3% -0.06 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 100.1 +0.62 2011 1459 105.4 -0.05 -0.94 1.250 55.5% — — — 60.0% +1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.27
26 2020 1746 124.7 +0.99 -2.03 0.927 48.5% -43 +95 — 47.2% -0.45 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 +0.44 2012 1672 133.4 +1.38 +2.74 1.138 52.7% -4 -182 -35 58.2% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.4 +0.40
27 2021 1694 129.7 +0.83 -1.96 0.965 49.5% -2 +114 +171 46.6% -0.36 7–6 (54%) 6–3 (67%) 103.5 +0.68 2013 1554 116.0 -3.73 +0.15 0.871 46.8% +4 -81 +19 37.6% -1.02 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) 97.2 -0.23
28 2022 1985 150.7 +5.57 -1.70 1.069 51.6% -48 -49 +11 63.0% +0.79 16–6 (73%) 12–15 (44%) 104.3 -0.40 2014 1542 107.7 -3.95 -1.33 0.834 45.9% +33 — — 35.7% -1.24 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.6 +0.26
29 2023 1832 148.1 +5.79 -3.68 1.052 51.1% +23 +46 +145 57.2% +0.39 12–11 (52%) 11–11 (50%) 97.2 +4.38 2015 1582 111.2 -0.41 -0.09 0.996 50.3% +31 — — 48.1% +0.04 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — +0.05
30 2024 1764 138.5 +3.01 -3.41 0.979 49.7% +38 +75 — 47.0% -0.20 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 101.9 +0.58 2016 1586 119.0 -0.64 +0.61 0.979 49.4% -1 -70 -44 47.4% -0.11 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.11
31 2025 1724 135.4 -1.26 -0.80 0.832 46.2% +37 — — 34.5% -0.97 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 -0.54 2017 1601 109.3 -4.02 +0.80 0.895 47.4% -15 -59 -29 37.0% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +0.19
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1778 132.6 -0.63 +4.07 1.073 51.5% -22 -182 -83 58.2% +0.56 12–6 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 108.9 -0.49
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1781 146.5 +0.12 +2.75 1.033 50.7% +29 -185 -15 52.6% +0.24 16–9 (64%) 10–8 (56%) 107.5 -1.32
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1707 118.1 -2.64 +0.13 0.796 44.9% +27 -121 — 17.6% -2.35 0–1 1–0 — -0.47
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1687 126.8 -2.62 -0.02 0.895 47.4% +64 -177 — 43.1% -0.80 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) — -1.53
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1658 96.7 -0.52 -0.38 1.002 49.4% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.20
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1628 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2003 145.7 +3.40 -2.00 1.011 50.4% -5 -5 +3 53.4% +0.18 117–90 (57%) 94–87 (52%) 104.3 +0.92 — 1881 128.6 -1.28 +1.43 0.970 49.3% +14 -131 -34 46.0% -0.30 63–56 (53%) 39–44 (47%) 103.9 -0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.