H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Catherine Bellis vs Julia Boserup H2H: 0-1

Julia Boserup holds a 1–0 lead over Catherine Bellis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julia Boserup leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Boserup won the 2016 Quebec City quarterfinal 7-6(0) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Catherine Bellis
United States Age 27 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Julia Boserup
United States Age 35 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julia Boserup #125 7-6(0) 6-4 Catherine Bellis #120 Match data Sep 17, 2016* QF Quebec City International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Catherine Bellis #337 #35 1,445 1,832 40 36 52.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Julia Boserup #686 #80 746 1,588 12 14 46.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Catherine Bellis Julia Boserup
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2014 1–1 50.0% #254 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2015 2–2 50.0% #233 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2016 6–4 60.0% #75 1,675 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2017 17–15 53.1% #46 1,721 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2018 7–7 50.0% #130 1,797 0 0 2011 0–1 0.0% #218 1,483 0 0
21 2020 7–7 50.0% #133 1,767 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — 2014 2–1 66.7% #194 1,509 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #191 1,491 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2016 6–3 66.7% #119 1,536 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2017 4–8 33.3% #147 1,570 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Catherine Bellis Julia Boserup
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2014 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2015 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2016 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2017 8 9 17 47.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2018 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2020 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career — 31 29 60 51.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 74/75 of Catherine Bellis's and 25/25 of Julia Boserup's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Catherine Bellis Julia Boserup
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2015 4/4 0.8 2.8 58.7% 62.0% 56.4% 55.4% 58.1% 59.9% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2016 10/11 1.8 3.9 54.6% 57.7% 46.6% 41.8% 39.9% 52.6% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2017 32/32 1.3 3.5 59.5% 63.8% 44.6% 56.4% 49.3% 56.0% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2018 14/14 1.1 3.2 64.5% 61.0% 46.1% 57.2% 48.7% 55.3% 44.9% 2011 1/1 1.0 2.0 66.7% 58.8% 41.2% 37.5% 10.0% 52.9% 41.0%
21 2020 14/14 1.5 3.1 61.3% 60.7% 46.4% 51.1% 53.7% 55.1% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 3/3 2.3 10.3 55.8% 64.4% 41.0% 60.7% 45.3% 54.1% 36.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 9/9 2.9 3.8 68.3% 66.5% 42.8% 50.6% 51.4% 59.0% 44.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 12/12 2.0 4.8 61.8% 63.0% 40.8% 56.8% 38.3% 54.4% 37.2%
Career — 74/77 1.4 3.4 60.1% 61.8% 46.1% 53.5% 49.2% 55.4% 43.1% — 25/26 2.3 5.0 63.6% 64.3% 41.6% 54.3% 42.7% 56.0% 39.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Catherine Bellis Julia Boserup
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2014 1515 110.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.67 1–1 — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2015 1539 120.5 +2.12 -1.12 0.868 47.4% +18 — — 50.0% +0.38 — 0–1 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2016 1675 116.5 -1.00 +2.02 0.975 49.2% +13 — — 54.2% +0.12 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2017 1721 133.7 -0.05 -0.02 0.951 49.2% -33 -75 -81 51.9% -0.08 7–6 (54%) 4–3 (57%) 103.3 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2018 1798 144.4 +0.45 +1.52 1.004 50.2% -13 — — 48.3% -0.45 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.1 -1.38 2011 1484 96.6 -3.78 -4.47 0.872 45.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14
20 2019 1789 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2020 1767 127.9 -1.33 +1.66 0.990 49.8% +18 — — 48.5% -0.27 3–2 (60%) 4–3 (57%) 100.9 +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1509 101.8 -1.05 -2.83 0.792 45.5% +21 — — 50.0% -0.38 2–0 — — +0.20
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1492 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.15
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1537 107.8 +0.42 +0.55 1.076 51.1% +5 — +104 57.9% +0.05 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.72
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1570 105.7 -1.46 -2.39 0.817 45.7% +9 — +39 34.6% -1.31 1–1 — — -0.45
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1538 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1832 139.7 -0.21 +0.81 0.968 49.4% -5 -75 -81 50.8% -0.10 15–12 (56%) 11–9 (55%) 104.2 -1.57 — 1588 105.5 -0.83 -1.47 0.903 47.6% +10 — +72 43.1% -0.83 5–3 (63%) 1–0 — +2.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.