H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Chloe Paquet vs Stefanie Voegele H2H: 0-1
Stefanie Voegele holds a 1–0 lead over Chloe Paquet in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stefanie Voegele leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Stefanie Voegele won the 2021 Bogota third round 3-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 36
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2022 | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | Q2 | Clay | Chloe Paquet | 6-2 6-3 | Stefanie Voegele | Match data |
| Apr 8, 2021* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Stefanie Voegele | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | Chloe Paquet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloe Paquet | #297 | #96 | 746 | 1,634 | 18 | 49 | 26.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stefanie Voegele | #1,075 | #42 | 1,255 | 1,712 | 100 | 175 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chloe Paquet | Stefanie Voegele | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #135 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #92 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #169 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #119 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #164 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #157 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #123 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #119 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #260 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |