H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Chloe Paquet vs Tereza Martincova H2H: 1-0
Chloe Paquet holds a 1–0 lead over Tereza Martincova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chloe Paquet leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chloe Paquet won the 2022 Prague third round 2-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 31
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2022* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Chloe Paquet | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Tereza Martincova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloe Paquet | #297 | #96 | 746 | 1,634 | 18 | 49 | 26.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tereza Martincova | #283 | #40 | 1,293 | 1,800 | 70 | 102 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chloe Paquet | Tereza Martincova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #296 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #197 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #169 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #120 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #48 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #164 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #157 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #123 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |