H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Chloe Paquet vs Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva H2H: 0-1
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva holds a 1–0 lead over Chloe Paquet in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva won the 2022 Seoul third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AND
Age 20
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2022* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva | 6-2 6-2 | Chloe Paquet | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloe Paquet | #297 | #96 | 746 | 1,634 | 18 | 49 | 26.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva | #114 | #89 | 841 | 1,721 | 9 | 20 | 31.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Chloe Paquet | Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #156 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #115 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #169 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2022 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #164 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #157 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #123 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |