H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Chloe Paquet vs Xinyun Han H2H: 1-0
Chloe Paquet holds a 1–0 lead over Xinyun Han in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chloe Paquet leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chloe Paquet won the 2019 Strasbourg fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2019* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Chloe Paquet | 6-3 6-3 | Xinyun Han | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloe Paquet | #297 | #96 | 746 | 1,634 | 18 | 49 | 26.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Xinyun Han | #1,386 | #105 | 597 | 1,565 | 21 | 33 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Chloe Paquet | Xinyun Han | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #339 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #169 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #324 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #164 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #111 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #157 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #131 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #123 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #159 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #187 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |