H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Garbiñe Muguruza H2H: 0-1
Garbiñe Muguruza holds a 1–0 lead over Coco Gauff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Garbiñe Muguruza leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Garbiñe Muguruza won the 2020 Rome third round 7-6(3) 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 32
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2020* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Garbiñe Muguruza | 7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | Coco Gauff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | #1,129 | #1 | 6,766 | 2,067 | 306 | 178 | 63.2% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Garbiñe Muguruza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | 2013 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #63 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2015 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #3 | 1,950 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | 2016 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #7 | 1,837 | 1 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #2 | 1,932 | 2 | 5 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,841 | 2 | 6 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #36 | 1,814 | 2 | 7 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #15 | 1,933 | 2 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,023 | 2 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #55 | 1,783 | 2 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1081 | 1,729 | 2 | 10 |