H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Rebecca Marino H2H: 2-0
Coco Gauff holds a 2–0 lead over Rebecca Marino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Coco Gauff leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2023 Miami second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2023* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Coco Gauff | 6-4 6-3 | Rebecca Marino | Match data |
| May 24, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Coco Gauff | 7-5 6-0 | Rebecca Marino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Rebecca Marino | #361 | #38 | 1,322 | 1,726 | 48 | 77 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Rebecca Marino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #356 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #104 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #64 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #145 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #176 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #102 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |