H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Coco Vandeweghe vs Ashleigh Barty H2H: 1-1

Coco Vandeweghe and Ashleigh Barty are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ashleigh Barty won the 2018 Pan Pacific Open first round 4-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Ashleigh Barty
AUS Age 30 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ashleigh Barty #17 4-6 6-3 7-5 Coco Vandeweghe #49 Match data Sep 20, 2018* R32 Pan Pacific Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Coco Vandeweghe #12 6-3 6-3 Ashleigh Barty #20 Match data Nov 5, 2017* SF Zhuhai WTA Finals Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,880 138 152 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Ashleigh Barty #1 #1 10,185 2,180 197 72 73.2% 3 3 2 5 2 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Ashleigh Barty
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0 2012 0–4 0.0% #175 1,469 0 0
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0 2013 4–5 44.4% #190 1,519 0 0
18 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,567 0 0 2014 1–6 14.3% #223 1,510 0 0
19 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,605 0 0 2016 2–1 66.7% #272 1,595 0 0
21 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0 2017 30–14 68.2% #17 1,891 0 1
22 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1 2018 42–19 68.9% #15 1,973 0 3
23 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1 2019 52–12 81.2% #1 2,082 1 7
24 2016 22–18 55.0% #36 1,732 0 2 2020 12–3 80.0% #1 2,083 1 8
25 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,858 0 2 2021 43–8 84.3% #1 2,117 2 13
26 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,690 0 2 2022 11–0 100.0% #1 2,180 3 15
27 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,689 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,591 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Ashleigh Barty
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2013 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 2010 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 2011 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
21 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2017 22 9 31 71.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2018 25 11 36 69.4% 7 5 12 58.3% 10 3 13 76.9%
23 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 2019 33 9 42 78.6% 11 2 13 84.6% 8 1 9 88.9%
24 2016 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 2020 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 2021 22 4 26 84.6% 14 4 18 77.8% 7 0 7 100.0%
26 2018 1 9 10 10.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2022 11 0 11 100.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 81 107 188 43.1% 16 21 37 43.2% 41 24 65 63.1% — 129 46 175 73.7% 35 17 52 67.3% 33 9 42 78.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's and 243/269 of Ashleigh Barty's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Ashleigh Barty
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.4% 69.6% 38.2% 50.0% 100.0% 50.9% 26.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1/1 7.0 7.0 53.2% 75.8% 41.4% 62.5% 16.7% 59.7% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 3/3 1.3 2.3 58.0% 53.2% 40.3% 36.1% 50.7% 47.4% 37.5% 2012 4/4 2.8 5.3 58.7% 60.8% 32.7% 35.0% 43.3% 49.0% 32.0%
17 2009 3/3 3.7 0.0 64.6% 54.3% 58.5% 52.3% 36.7% 55.8% 36.4% 2013 6/9 3.5 2.7 54.3% 65.7% 50.2% 36.3% 44.9% 58.4% 37.5%
18 2010 11/12 4.5 5.5 58.9% 63.3% 38.8% 49.9% 47.6% 53.0% 42.0% 2014 4/7 3.0 3.8 57.5% 63.1% 50.5% 57.1% 56.5% 57.6% 32.7%
19 2011 21/21 3.9 5.3 52.3% 64.7% 44.8% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 12/13 5.7 5.1 48.8% 74.1% 45.6% 66.1% 63.0% 59.6% 40.2% 2016 3/3 6.7 3.7 65.2% 73.9% 47.4% 68.3% 35.5% 64.7% 43.8%
21 2013 16/16 5.8 4.9 49.7% 68.0% 46.7% 50.2% 43.9% 56.9% 41.9% 2017 41/44 5.0 2.9 60.9% 72.5% 50.3% 58.9% 51.7% 63.6% 44.1%
22 2014 36/36 8.5 4.6 53.3% 76.0% 47.8% 52.7% 45.7% 62.8% 40.3% 2018 58/61 4.9 2.9 58.4% 71.9% 53.7% 53.1% 47.3% 64.3% 42.6%
23 2015 34/41 6.8 3.6 54.9% 70.6% 56.0% 60.3% 42.3% 63.9% 37.0% 2019 54/64 6.5 3.2 57.5% 73.7% 52.1% 54.7% 47.4% 64.4% 45.3%
24 2016 38/40 5.9 3.7 54.7% 72.8% 49.4% 54.0% 45.2% 62.3% 41.9% 2020 14/15 5.6 1.9 60.7% 73.5% 49.9% 60.4% 53.0% 64.4% 44.0%
25 2017 47/47 5.3 4.3 54.7% 74.4% 50.5% 61.6% 43.8% 63.6% 41.3% 2021 48/51 6.7 3.3 58.8% 75.8% 49.4% 59.3% 48.7% 64.8% 46.0%
26 2018 25/25 5.9 5.2 54.5% 69.3% 46.5% 55.0% 43.6% 59.1% 38.2% 2022 11/11 7.0 1.7 60.3% 81.1% 58.6% 90.0% 60.2% 72.2% 48.2%
27 2019 4/4 3.5 5.0 45.4% 65.4% 40.8% 48.8% 24.6% 52.3% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 2/2 6.0 7.0 55.9% 70.7% 37.8% 64.6% 22.2% 56.1% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 13/13 5.8 4.9 55.2% 66.9% 45.9% 39.1% 44.7% 57.6% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 9/9 6.0 4.4 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 48.0% 40.8% 57.5% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 3/3 7.3 6.3 49.4% 66.2% 41.4% 41.5% 20.1% 53.6% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 279/290 5.9 4.5 53.8% 70.7% 48.2% 54.6% 44.2% 60.2% 39.6% — 243/269 5.7 3.0 58.9% 73.2% 51.4% 57.3% 49.1% 64.2% 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Ashleigh Barty
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2006 1485 98.4 -1.31 -2.15 0.531 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1480 104.6 -2.63 -2.18 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 1453 104.3 +0.09 -1.10 0.713 42.8% +20 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14 2012 1469 97.5 -1.40 -1.92 0.627 41.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.26
17 2009 1466 104.1 +1.17 -2.23 0.824 46.3% +13 — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.10 2013 1519 110.4 +0.25 -1.62 0.902 47.5% +1 — — 47.6% -1.05 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.14
18 2010 1567 119.9 -0.34 -0.02 0.895 47.8% +7 — — 45.8% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — +0.28 2014 1510 114.8 +1.59 -1.59 0.772 46.2% +7 — — 23.1% -2.15 0–1 0–1 — -0.81
19 2011 1543 108.2 -1.37 -3.03 0.887 47.8% +26 — +40 34.8% -0.78 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 102.6 +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 1605 131.1 +3.23 -0.27 0.996 49.9% +24 — — 48.3% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.31 2016 1595 108.1 -0.11 +1.91 1.241 53.2% — — +26 57.1% +1.57 1–0 0–2 — -0.09
21 2013 1563 120.9 +0.40 -1.77 0.973 49.4% +55 — — 37.8% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 95.2 +0.12 2017 1892 150.0 +6.11 +1.57 1.211 54.0% -27 -297 -172 61.4% +1.02 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 111.0 -1.16
22 2014 1731 138.8 +5.61 -2.20 1.082 51.2% -19 — -18 55.7% +0.23 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) 106.7 -0.26 2018 1973 151.5 +6.83 +0.72 1.194 53.1% -6 -281 -148 65.4% +1.08 10–3 (77%) 4–3 (57%) 108.4 -0.44
23 2015 1726 124.1 +4.83 -2.53 1.026 50.3% -38 -235 +47 51.1% -0.08 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 -1.43 2019 2083 165.1 +6.89 +3.36 1.272 54.6% +1 -186 -124 71.9% +1.58 19–6 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 107.5 -1.06
24 2016 1733 136.0 +5.07 -0.74 1.111 51.7% -68 -242 +155 56.2% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 100.7 -0.72 2020 2084 154.1 +5.09 +2.45 1.236 54.3% -5 — — 67.6% +1.59 5–1 (83%) 2–3 (40%) 100.7 -0.69
25 2017 1859 148.2 +6.32 -0.55 1.133 51.9% -29 -280 +61 60.0% +0.45 6–6 (50%) 11–2 (85%) 108.7 -1.00 2021 2118 162.9 +7.48 +3.74 1.306 55.3% +19 -82 +83 77.0% +1.89 14–3 (82%) 7–4 (64%) 110.2 -0.67
26 2018 1691 124.0 +2.04 -2.71 0.932 48.6% -31 -30 +160 43.4% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -0.76 2022 2181 159.7 +8.99 +4.21 1.735 59.8% +42 — — 95.7% +3.39 1–0 1–0 — -0.08
27 2019 1690 112.5 -0.39 -0.74 0.742 44.1% -7 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 1624 102.4 -0.35 -1.49 0.835 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 1591 99.2 -0.08 -3.74 0.881 47.2% -64 — +332 34.5% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.4 +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 1667 108.1 +0.32 -2.42 0.840 46.3% -63 +2 — 36.4% -0.96 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1534 102.7 -1.75 -2.65 0.707 43.4% -15 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1880 132.9 +3.27 -1.72 0.995 49.7% -17 -153 +106 47.8% -0.23 41–37 (53%) 46–37 (55%) 106.9 -0.94 — 2181 161.7 +6.38 +2.18 1.228 53.9% -1 -180 -96 67.3% +1.27 62–22 (74%) 29–22 (57%) 115.6 -2.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.