H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Coco Vandeweghe vs Kateryna Baindl

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Coco Vandeweghe vs Kateryna Baindl.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Kateryna Baindl
Ukraine Age 32 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Coco Vandeweghe #224 6-4 6-7(1) 6-4 Kateryna Baindl #159 Match data Jun 13, 2021 Q2 Q Birmingham WTA 250 Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,880 138 152 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Kateryna Baindl #467 #62 922 1,726 75 106 41.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Kateryna Baindl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,543 0 0 2013 1–2 33.3% #200 1,486 0 0
20 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,605 0 0 2014 1–3 25.0% #140 1,477 0 0
21 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0 2015 5–10 33.3% #162 1,473 0 0
22 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1 2016 12–11 52.2% #102 1,608 0 0
23 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1 2017 7–12 36.8% #86 1,566 0 0
24 2016 22–18 55.0% #36 1,732 0 2 2018 12–15 44.4% #98 1,526 0 0
25 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,858 0 2 2019 13–16 44.8% #91 1,664 0 0
26 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,690 0 2 2020 2–6 25.0% #106 1,623 0 0
27 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,689 0 2 2021 9–11 45.0% #144 1,690 0 0
28 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2 2022 4–5 44.4% #99 1,679 0 0
29 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,591 0 2 2023 9–13 40.9% #132 1,617 0 0
30 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2 2024 0–2 0.0% #445 1,551 0 0
31 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Kateryna Baindl
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2013 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 2012 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2015 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2016 6 5 11 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
24 2016 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 2018 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2018 1 9 10 10.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2022 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2021 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2023 5 8 13 38.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 81 107 188 43.1% 16 21 37 43.2% 41 24 65 63.1% — 45 67 112 40.2% 26 28 54 48.1% 4 11 15 26.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's and 173/182 of Kateryna Baindl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Kateryna Baindl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.4% 69.6% 38.2% 50.0% 100.0% 50.9% 26.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1/1 7.0 7.0 53.2% 75.8% 41.4% 62.5% 16.7% 59.7% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 3/3 1.3 2.3 58.0% 53.2% 40.3% 36.1% 50.7% 47.4% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 3/3 3.7 0.0 64.6% 54.3% 58.5% 52.3% 36.7% 55.8% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 11/12 4.5 5.5 58.9% 63.3% 38.8% 49.9% 47.6% 53.0% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 21/21 3.9 5.3 52.3% 64.7% 44.8% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 39.7% 2013 3/3 0.7 3.0 71.3% 54.3% 42.0% 66.6% 57.1% 50.4% 44.5%
20 2012 12/13 5.7 5.1 48.8% 74.1% 45.6% 66.1% 63.0% 59.6% 40.2% 2014 4/4 0.8 3.5 66.7% 56.2% 45.3% 55.8% 63.1% 52.6% 41.7%
21 2013 16/16 5.8 4.9 49.7% 68.0% 46.7% 50.2% 43.9% 56.9% 41.9% 2015 9/15 1.4 1.4 66.8% 56.0% 50.4% 56.2% 48.2% 54.4% 35.0%
22 2014 36/36 8.5 4.6 53.3% 76.0% 47.8% 52.7% 45.7% 62.8% 40.3% 2016 23/24 1.4 2.3 69.0% 60.2% 46.4% 48.2% 50.7% 56.0% 46.4%
23 2015 34/41 6.8 3.6 54.9% 70.6% 56.0% 60.3% 42.3% 63.9% 37.0% 2017 19/19 2.1 1.8 68.8% 58.9% 46.1% 51.0% 50.3% 54.9% 45.8%
24 2016 38/40 5.9 3.7 54.7% 72.8% 49.4% 54.0% 45.2% 62.3% 41.9% 2018 26/27 2.5 2.5 65.3% 60.6% 42.7% 46.1% 48.3% 54.5% 42.1%
25 2017 47/47 5.3 4.3 54.7% 74.4% 50.5% 61.6% 43.8% 63.6% 41.3% 2019 28/29 1.8 3.1 64.8% 59.1% 43.5% 45.1% 53.4% 53.6% 46.1%
26 2018 25/25 5.9 5.2 54.5% 69.3% 46.5% 55.0% 43.6% 59.1% 38.2% 2020 8/8 2.6 2.3 68.5% 58.3% 42.0% 44.4% 56.6% 53.0% 43.3%
27 2019 4/4 3.5 5.0 45.4% 65.4% 40.8% 48.8% 24.6% 52.3% 35.4% 2021 20/20 1.1 5.1 68.9% 60.3% 41.4% 45.1% 47.8% 54.3% 43.7%
28 2020 2/2 6.0 7.0 55.9% 70.7% 37.8% 64.6% 22.2% 56.1% 36.7% 2022 9/9 1.4 3.3 75.7% 59.2% 38.1% 57.8% 50.5% 54.1% 47.0%
29 2021 13/13 5.8 4.9 55.2% 66.9% 45.9% 39.1% 44.7% 57.6% 37.4% 2023 22/22 0.8 2.4 73.0% 58.4% 42.7% 48.8% 49.1% 53.8% 42.7%
30 2022 9/9 6.0 4.4 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 48.0% 40.8% 57.5% 35.7% 2024 2/2 0.0 2.5 68.6% 51.7% 14.8% 26.8% 25.0% 40.1% 39.0%
31 2023 3/3 7.3 6.3 49.4% 66.2% 41.4% 41.5% 20.1% 53.6% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 279/290 5.9 4.5 53.8% 70.7% 48.2% 54.6% 44.2% 60.2% 39.6% — 173/182 1.6 2.8 68.4% 59.1% 43.4% 48.4% 50.4% 54.1% 43.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Kateryna Baindl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2006 1485 98.4 -1.31 -2.15 0.531 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1480 104.6 -2.63 -2.18 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 1453 104.3 +0.09 -1.10 0.713 42.8% +20 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 1466 104.1 +1.17 -2.23 0.824 46.3% +13 — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 1567 119.9 -0.34 -0.02 0.895 47.8% +7 — — 45.8% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 1543 108.2 -1.37 -3.03 0.887 47.8% +26 — +40 34.8% -0.78 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 102.6 +1.49 2013 1487 98.2 -2.57 -1.35 0.897 47.5% +20 — — 37.5% -1.13 1–1 — — +0.31
20 2012 1605 131.1 +3.23 -0.27 0.996 49.9% +24 — — 48.3% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.31 2014 1477 103.7 -1.18 -0.33 0.880 48.0% +14 — — 40.0% -1.00 0–2 — — +0.24
21 2013 1563 120.9 +0.40 -1.77 0.973 49.4% +55 — — 37.8% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 95.2 +0.12 2015 1473 103.5 -1.86 -3.84 0.768 45.2% +3 — — 32.3% -1.39 1–0 1–1 — +0.37
22 2014 1731 138.8 +5.61 -2.20 1.082 51.2% -19 — -18 55.7% +0.23 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) 106.7 -0.26 2016 1609 123.4 +0.05 +1.48 1.055 51.1% -22 -19 +18 52.9% +0.22 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.71
23 2015 1726 124.1 +4.83 -2.53 1.026 50.3% -38 -235 +47 51.1% -0.08 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 -1.43 2017 1566 112.7 -0.46 +1.02 1.017 50.1% -42 +43 — 40.5% -0.38 1–3 (25%) 2–6 (25%) 92.9 +0.43
24 2016 1733 136.0 +5.07 -0.74 1.111 51.7% -68 -242 +155 56.2% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 100.7 -0.72 2018 1527 113.1 -1.72 -1.69 0.925 48.4% -7 +57 — 50.0% -0.26 1–7 (13%) 5–2 (71%) 95.3 +1.44
25 2017 1859 148.2 +6.32 -0.55 1.133 51.9% -29 -280 +61 60.0% +0.45 6–6 (50%) 11–2 (85%) 108.7 -1.00 2019 1664 128.4 -2.21 +1.99 0.993 49.8% -64 +78 — 48.4% -0.10 4–6 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 +0.33
26 2018 1691 124.0 +2.04 -2.71 0.932 48.6% -31 -30 +160 43.4% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -0.76 2020 1624 122.7 -1.33 -0.67 0.920 48.5% -26 — — 36.8% -0.68 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.16
27 2019 1690 112.5 -0.39 -0.74 0.742 44.1% -7 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.01 2021 1691 123.1 -0.60 -0.16 0.955 48.9% -72 +77 -49 45.1% -0.29 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 -0.41
28 2020 1624 102.4 -0.35 -1.49 0.835 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.12 2022 1679 115.5 -0.68 +1.66 1.024 50.5% — +142 — 38.9% -1.06 1–1 1–0 — -0.78
29 2021 1591 99.2 -0.08 -3.74 0.881 47.2% -64 — +332 34.5% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.4 +0.17 2023 1618 113.8 -2.11 -0.60 0.924 48.4% -12 +99 — 42.0% -0.68 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 98.6 +1.59
30 2022 1667 108.1 +0.32 -2.42 0.840 46.3% -63 +2 — 36.4% -0.96 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.03 2024 1551 97.6 -1.46 -2.17 0.652 39.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
31 2023 1534 102.7 -1.75 -2.65 0.707 43.4% -15 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1880 132.9 +3.27 -1.72 0.995 49.7% -17 -153 +106 47.8% -0.23 41–37 (53%) 46–37 (55%) 106.9 -0.94 — 1726 122.5 -1.28 +0.08 0.957 49.1% -25 +70 -16 44.1% -0.46 20–38 (34%) 20–21 (49%) 91.7 +1.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.