H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Yingying Duan holds a 1–0 lead over Coco Vandeweghe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yingying Duan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yingying Duan won the 2017 Sydney International second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yingying Duan | 6-3 6-2 | Coco Vandeweghe | Match data | Jan 11, 2017* | R16 | Sydney International | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Vandeweghe | #815 | #9 | 3,258 | 1,880 | 138 | 152 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Yingying Duan | #908 | #60 | 1,002 | 1,654 | 36 | 56 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Coco Vandeweghe | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #476 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #322 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #104 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #122 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #90 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #97 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #145 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #113 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #395 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #39 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #568 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #36 | 1,732 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #10 | 1,858 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #100 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #241 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #174 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,533 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Coco Vandeweghe | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | ||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 2010 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 2011 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2017 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 2012 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2018 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 2013 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2019 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 11 | 2 | 13 | 84.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 19 | 12 | 31 | 61.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 81 | 107 | 188 | 43.1% | 16 | 21 | 37 | 43.2% | 41 | 24 | 65 | 63.1% | Career | 32 | 46 | 78 | 41.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's and 85/92 of Yingying Duan's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Coco Vandeweghe | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2006 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 40.4% | 69.6% | 38.2% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 50.9% | 26.1% | 2012 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 64.1% | 67.9% | 49.1% | 85.0% | 45.8% | 61.7% | 42.0% |
| 2007 | 1/1 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 53.2% | 75.8% | 41.4% | 62.5% | 16.7% | 59.7% | 30.9% | 2013 | 5/5 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 65.5% | 58.9% | 40.6% | 29.4% | 56.0% | 52.3% | 42.5% |
| 2008 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 58.0% | 53.2% | 40.3% | 36.1% | 50.7% | 47.4% | 37.5% | 2014 | 5/7 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 61.4% | 60.9% | 46.0% | 57.6% | 51.7% | 54.9% | 39.8% |
| 2009 | 3/3 | 3.7 | 0.0 | 64.6% | 54.3% | 58.5% | 52.3% | 36.7% | 55.8% | 36.4% | 2015 | 9/13 | 3.1 | 3.7 | 61.2% | 71.3% | 44.9% | 55.4% | 39.5% | 60.8% | 39.4% |
| 2010 | 11/12 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 58.9% | 63.3% | 38.8% | 49.9% | 47.6% | 53.0% | 42.0% | 2016 | 14/15 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 65.4% | 66.2% | 44.5% | 56.6% | 43.4% | 58.7% | 42.0% |
| 2011 | 21/21 | 3.9 | 5.3 | 52.3% | 64.7% | 44.8% | 49.5% | 41.2% | 55.2% | 39.7% | 2017 | 28/28 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 67.2% | 61.1% | 42.7% | 52.1% | 48.3% | 55.1% | 39.7% |
| 2012 | 12/13 | 5.7 | 5.1 | 48.8% | 74.1% | 45.6% | 66.1% | 63.0% | 59.6% | 40.2% | 2018 | 16/16 | 3.9 | 3.6 | 67.8% | 63.8% | 37.4% | 61.2% | 47.4% | 55.7% | 41.0% |
| 2013 | 16/16 | 5.8 | 4.9 | 49.7% | 68.0% | 46.7% | 50.2% | 43.9% | 56.9% | 41.9% | 2019 | 5/5 | 1.2 | 2.6 | 63.1% | 64.4% | 40.2% | 43.6% | 33.0% | 55.4% | 35.6% |
| 2014 | 36/36 | 8.5 | 4.6 | 53.3% | 76.0% | 47.8% | 52.7% | 45.7% | 62.8% | 40.3% | 2020 | 1/1 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 70.4% | 60.5% | 43.8% | 62.5% | 50.0% | 55.6% | 24.5% |
| 2015 | 34/41 | 6.8 | 3.6 | 54.9% | 70.6% | 56.0% | 60.3% | 42.3% | 63.9% | 37.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 38/40 | 5.9 | 3.7 | 54.7% | 72.8% | 49.4% | 54.0% | 45.2% | 62.3% | 41.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 47/47 | 5.3 | 4.3 | 54.7% | 74.4% | 50.5% | 61.6% | 43.8% | 63.6% | 41.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 25/25 | 5.9 | 5.2 | 54.5% | 69.3% | 46.5% | 55.0% | 43.6% | 59.1% | 38.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 4/4 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 45.4% | 65.4% | 40.8% | 48.8% | 24.6% | 52.3% | 35.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 2/2 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 55.9% | 70.7% | 37.8% | 64.6% | 22.2% | 56.1% | 36.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 13/13 | 5.8 | 4.9 | 55.2% | 66.9% | 45.9% | 39.1% | 44.7% | 57.6% | 37.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 9/9 | 6.0 | 4.4 | 50.7% | 69.4% | 45.3% | 48.0% | 40.8% | 57.5% | 35.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 3/3 | 7.3 | 6.3 | 49.4% | 66.2% | 41.4% | 41.5% | 20.1% | 53.6% | 32.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 279/290 | 5.9 | 4.5 | 53.8% | 70.7% | 48.2% | 54.6% | 44.2% | 60.2% | 39.6% | Career | 85/92 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 65.7% | 63.7% | 42.3% | 54.3% | 46.1% | 56.4% | 40.1% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Coco Vandeweghe | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2006 | 1485 | 98.4 | -1.31 | -2.15 | 0.531 | 39.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.21 | 2012 | 1508 | 106.9 | -0.29 | -0.87 | 1.098 | 51.7% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.01 |
| 2007 | 1480 | 104.6 | -2.63 | -2.18 | 0.766 | 44.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.09 | 2013 | 1511 | 104.6 | -0.82 | -0.25 | 0.890 | 47.5% | +21 | — | — | 36.4% | -1.45 | 1–0 | 2–0 | — | +0.08 |
| 2008 | 1453 | 104.3 | +0.09 | -1.10 | 0.713 | 42.8% | +20 | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.14 | 2014 | 1477 | 101.2 | -1.58 | -1.40 | 0.882 | 47.6% | +14 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.60 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.69 |
| 2009 | 1466 | 104.1 | +1.17 | -2.23 | 0.824 | 46.3% | +13 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.83 | — | — | — | -0.10 | 2015 | 1517 | 106.8 | +0.96 | -1.58 | 1.004 | 49.9% | -2 | — | — | 46.7% | -0.33 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | 98.5 | +0.60 |
| 2010 | 1567 | 119.9 | -0.34 | -0.02 | 0.895 | 47.8% | +7 | — | — | 45.8% | -0.83 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.28 | 2016 | 1538 | 108.9 | +0.86 | -0.78 | 1.017 | 50.6% | -26 | — | — | 48.6% | -0.06 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–1 | — | +1.24 |
| 2011 | 1543 | 108.2 | -1.37 | -3.03 | 0.887 | 47.8% | +26 | — | +40 | 34.8% | -0.78 | 4–0 (100%) | 1–5 (17%) | 102.6 | +1.49 | 2017 | 1583 | 117.0 | -0.51 | -2.33 | 0.883 | 47.6% | +30 | -93 | -6 | 39.3% | -0.93 | 3–4 (43%) | 5–4 (56%) | 100.8 | +0.64 |
| 2012 | 1605 | 131.1 | +3.23 | -0.27 | 0.996 | 49.9% | +24 | — | — | 48.3% | -0.10 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -0.31 | 2018 | 1573 | 127.1 | -0.70 | -1.07 | 0.927 | 48.5% | +3 | — | — | 39.5% | -0.55 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.27 |
| 2013 | 1563 | 120.9 | +0.40 | -1.77 | 0.973 | 49.4% | +55 | — | — | 37.8% | -0.43 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–4 (33%) | 95.2 | +0.12 | 2019 | 1542 | 109.9 | -0.01 | -4.94 | 0.799 | 45.8% | +17 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.67 | 1–1 | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.18 |
| 2014 | 1731 | 138.8 | +5.61 | -2.20 | 1.082 | 51.2% | -19 | — | -18 | 55.7% | +0.23 | 7–4 (64%) | 7–6 (54%) | 106.7 | -0.26 | 2020 | 1533 | 102.9 | +0.45 | -3.00 | 0.551 | 40.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.05 |
| 2015 | 1726 | 124.1 | +4.83 | -2.53 | 1.026 | 50.3% | -38 | -235 | +47 | 51.1% | -0.08 | 8–6 (57%) | 10–3 (77%) | 107.1 | -1.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 1733 | 136.0 | +5.07 | -0.74 | 1.111 | 51.7% | -68 | -242 | +155 | 56.2% | +0.31 | 5–6 (45%) | 5–4 (56%) | 100.7 | -0.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 1859 | 148.2 | +6.32 | -0.55 | 1.133 | 51.9% | -29 | -280 | +61 | 60.0% | +0.45 | 6–6 (50%) | 11–2 (85%) | 108.7 | -1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 1691 | 124.0 | +2.04 | -2.71 | 0.932 | 48.6% | -31 | -30 | +160 | 43.4% | -0.55 | 2–5 (29%) | 6–5 (55%) | 95.6 | -0.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 1690 | 112.5 | -0.39 | -0.74 | 0.742 | 44.1% | -7 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.63 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 1624 | 102.4 | -0.35 | -1.49 | 0.835 | 46.5% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1591 | 99.2 | -0.08 | -3.74 | 0.881 | 47.2% | -64 | — | +332 | 34.5% | -1.10 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–3 (40%) | 96.4 | +0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 1667 | 108.1 | +0.32 | -2.42 | 0.840 | 46.3% | -63 | +2 | — | 36.4% | -0.96 | 4–0 (100%) | 0–1 | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1534 | 102.7 | -1.75 | -2.65 | 0.707 | 43.4% | -15 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.72 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1880 | 132.9 | +3.27 | -1.72 | 0.995 | 49.7% | -17 | -153 | +106 | 47.8% | -0.23 | 41–37 (53%) | 46–37 (55%) | 106.9 | -0.94 | Career | 1655 | 118.7 | -0.20 | -1.71 | 0.920 | 48.4% | +8 | -93 | -6 | 40.4% | -0.66 | 12–16 (43%) | 11–15 (42%) | 97.2 | +3.00 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 3, 2017 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 3 | 4 | 7 | Mar 14, 2016 | H2H |
| Alison Riske-Amritraj | 3 | 3 | 6 | Aug 5, 2021 | H2H |
| Kristina Mladenovic | 3 | 2 | 5 | May 7, 2018 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 3 | 2 | 5 | Apr 29, 2018 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 10, 2019 | H2H |
| Kristina Mladenovic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 12, 2019 | H2H |
| Zarina Diyas | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jan 8, 2020 | H2H |
| Luksika Kumkhum | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 13, 2018 | H2H |
| Lin Zhu | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 26, 2018 | H2H |